View Full Version : MP Tarrax - Newbie Game (running) - EA 4-8 players on tiny/small random map
Tarrax
October 25th, 2009, 07:56 PM
I'm a newbie both in multiplayer Dom3 as well as game making. So I wanted to organize a newbie game to gain experience on both areas. I don't know how realistic this is but my goal is to have a quick newbie game that will end before Christmas. Here are the game settings (additions/clarifications will be made as needed):
* LlamaServer
* CBM 1.6
* Early Age
* 4-8 players
* Tiny or small random map
* Mercs are OK
* Non-binding diplomacy
* No score graphs
* Last pretender standing
* Turns every 24 hours first 10 turns adjusted as necessary afterwards
The rest of the settings will be standard or will be clarified if needed.
I will update this post with the nations as people sign up. We will start once we think there is a reasonable number of players.
Players signed up:
* Tarrax - Marverni
* Fantomen - Agartha
* Svamptripp (replaced by Hurmio) - Mictlan
* Kref - Fomoria
* jmb - Arco
* Louppatient - Sauromatia
* sansanjuan - Ulm
So if you're a newbie, show your interest by posting here. :D
Thanks.
Tarrax
Fantomen
October 25th, 2009, 10:59 PM
I might not be newbie enough anymore, but if I´m welcome I´d like to play Agartha.
Tarrax
October 25th, 2009, 11:55 PM
As long as other newbies don't object, you're welcome sure. :) I actually like to learn. Thanks for your interest. We'll see who else is interested.
Svamptripp
October 26th, 2009, 07:58 AM
I'm a long time lurker and for sure a newbie. I would like to try MP and if it's ok I would like to play as Mictlan.
Tarrax
October 26th, 2009, 08:55 AM
I'm a long time lurker and for sure a newbie. I would like to try MP and if it's ok I would like to play as Mictlan.
Sure. Added you in.
Pelthin
October 26th, 2009, 01:44 PM
I would love to play, sounds like fun!
How about Lanka for me.
jmb
October 26th, 2009, 02:19 PM
How long would the turns last? And can I take Arco, please?
Louppatient
October 26th, 2009, 03:10 PM
I'm interested, with Sauromatia (second MP game for me, the first is in its first turn, so I should qualify as MP newbie :) )
Tarrax
October 26th, 2009, 07:08 PM
For turns I am thinking one turn every 24 hours for at least first 10 turns. Then we can stretch to every 36 or 48 hours if needed. We can talk about it at that point.
It looks like we already have 6. Should we wait for a couple more or start?
I think I'll take Marverni.
Svamptripp
October 27th, 2009, 05:27 PM
If no one else is joining I'm ok to start with the 6 players we have now. For turns it's ok for me to start with 24h per turn.
Fantomen
October 27th, 2009, 06:01 PM
Six players is fine I think.
How about this map: http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=44093
93 land provinces is pretty good for 6 players, and the map looks nice.
jmb
October 27th, 2009, 06:07 PM
Six players is fine I think.
How about this map: http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=44093
93 land provinces is pretty good for 6 players, and the map looks nice.
Fine with me.
Svamptripp
October 27th, 2009, 07:01 PM
Six players is fine I think.
How about this map: http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=44093
93 land provinces is pretty good for 6 players, and the map looks nice.
Very nice map. Totally ok with me.
Tarrax
October 27th, 2009, 08:01 PM
Looks like a great map. In that case I'm gonna stop recruiting and create the game.
Tarrax
October 27th, 2009, 11:10 PM
I received a PM from sansanjuan asking if he could be Ulm so I added him in. We're 7 now. I still haven't created the game. The map isn't on Llamaserver so I PMd the map creator asking permission to upload it to Llamaserver.
Fantomen
October 28th, 2009, 06:40 AM
The map is already uploaded in the maps forum and is made for multiplayer by a known mapmaker, you don´t need any permissions to use it. Leaving your thanks in the maps thread is a nice gesture though.
Tarrax
October 28th, 2009, 09:47 AM
OK, game created. Upload your pretenders! :D
Louppatient
October 28th, 2009, 04:52 PM
Done :)
Svamptripp
October 29th, 2009, 05:46 PM
Sorry for the delay. As I made the last pretender the game has now started. Good luck to everyone. :D
Tarrax
October 29th, 2009, 08:19 PM
No prob. Good luck everyone. :)
Tarrax
October 30th, 2009, 12:34 AM
By the way, Pelthin are you Fomoria? You had asked for Lanka. Not a big deal, just making sure it's you.
Louppatient
November 1st, 2009, 04:27 AM
I just got the 4th turn this morning, and :
- Formoria seems not to be Pelthin (I suppose the in-game message asking if there was a related forum was sent to all players ?)
- Agartha staled
Svamptripp
November 1st, 2009, 05:07 AM
I just got the 4th turn this morning, and :
- Formoria seems not to be Pelthin (I suppose the in-game message asking if there was a related forum was sent to all players ?)
- Agartha staled
I also got that message and it seems that someone took Pelthins place. If that's the case then I think we should consider to restart the game if he still wants to play.
jmb
November 1st, 2009, 06:40 AM
I just got the 4th turn this morning, and :
- Formoria seems not to be Pelthin (I suppose the in-game message asking if there was a related forum was sent to all players ?)
- Agartha staled
I also got that message and it seems that someone took Pelthins place. If that's the case then I think we should consider to restart the game if he still wants to play.
I agree.
Fantomen
November 1st, 2009, 12:25 PM
Yup I staled. Not because of lack of time but because I forgot to send the turn after doing it, totally stupid:doh:
I second the call for a restart, not because I staled (my own fault), but I think it´s unacceptable that people steal someones player slot.
Still, even if we restart, we should host another time just to make contact with the guy. Apparantly he doesn´t know the customs here and meant no harm.
Tarrax
November 1st, 2009, 06:27 PM
Pelthin,
Can you post here to verify you're not playing right now? We can do a restart. I'll also PM you.
Tarrax
November 1st, 2009, 08:22 PM
This is what I got from Pelthin. I'll follow general consensus.
Quote:
Tarrax,
it is not me. My computer crashed, and I jsut got it back up and running.
I need to bow out of the game, so whoever the other person is can keep playing and I will bow out.
Thanks.
Fantomen
November 1st, 2009, 08:41 PM
Sorry for Pelthin.
I guess the other unknown person can play if he gets in on the forum and understands how it works in future sing-ups.
I´ve had the same thing happening in two other games so I think it´s important to discourage this behaviour.
Kref
November 2nd, 2009, 04:33 AM
Hello, I'm playing for Fomoria.
I tried to find some games on http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145, but has difficulties with finding a game with acceptable parameters which is not already running.
Can someone tell me how to find not started games at this forum in future?
Else one moment: what means "non-binding diplomacy"? I shouldn't try to make non-agression pacts and trade items with other players?
Fantomen
November 2nd, 2009, 06:29 AM
Hi Kref, welcome to the community!
You find games and sign up here. Sometimes there are none that are open, in that case you can start your own by posting a new game thread and describing what kind of game it is, house rules, how many players you are looking for etc. Usually you create the game on the llamaserver or elsewhere when you have full signups.
Keep in mind not to sign up in too many games initially, a single game can become very time consuming after a while and go on for many months.
Non-binding diplomacy should mean any deals are based entirely on in-game trust, and that players are allowed to break treaties as they wish. In other words: If you´re backstabbed you can´t complain about it. Also called Machiavellan diplomacy in some games.
Tarrax
November 2nd, 2009, 09:39 AM
Kref,
As for finding not-started games, the title of the game thread in the forum will usually say something like (recruiting) or (closed) or (awaiting pretenders) or (running). The ones that are currently open will say (recruiting). The others mean the game has enough players and started or about to start.
Welcome again.
Louppatient
November 2nd, 2009, 03:37 PM
Just a precision :
There may be other forums which may propose games, on the Llamaserver or elsewhere.
There's a french one for sure which hosts his game on Llamaserver, I don't know if there are others ...
Tarrax
November 7th, 2009, 03:14 AM
I think we are having a good game so far. Since we passed turn 10, I wanted to ask everyone whether we should increase the host duration from once every 24 hours. Personally, I think it's still fine as it is and I always look forward to doing the next turn. :D However, if anyone thinks they need more time we can increase it.
Svamptripp
November 7th, 2009, 03:44 AM
I think we have a good pace and I'd like to continue with 24 hours turns.
jmb
November 7th, 2009, 02:31 PM
I think we are having a good game so far. Since we passed turn 10, I wanted to ask everyone whether we should increase the host duration from once every 24 hours. Personally, I think it's still fine as it is and I always look forward to doing the next turn. :D However, if anyone thinks they need more time we can increase it.
I'm quite all right with 24 hours for now, however I would like to request a small delay: I've just sent my turn #13, but I won't be home on Sunday, so I may be late for next turn (depending on what time everyone submits turn #13). Would it be possible to make sure that turn #14 doesn't host before 24:00GMT on Sunday? Thanks.
sansanjuan
November 7th, 2009, 05:36 PM
All,
Of the six MP games I've played, this is the best paced thus far. I'm enjoying playing Ulm despite a couple big blunders already:doh:. Good luck all.
-ssj
Tarrax
November 7th, 2009, 08:17 PM
Hosting postponed 7 hours by jmb's request.
Hosting postponed for Tarrax by 7 hours. The game will now host at 00:45 GMT on Monday November 9th.
Fantomen
November 13th, 2009, 06:28 PM
I´ve sent in the current turn, but I would need a delay until monday on the next one if that´s okay.
jmb
November 14th, 2009, 01:07 PM
Gah! I almost missed the turn. I sent it with plenty of time to the wrong address :( And I almost missed the reminder...
Tarrax
November 14th, 2009, 06:49 PM
Hosting postponed for Tarrax by 6 hours. The game will now host at 00:34 GMT on Monday November 16th.
Louppatient
November 15th, 2009, 03:09 PM
I am going AI this turn : my capital has fallen, my army totals less than twenty hoburg militia and a handful of hoburg priest, and I'm down to only a very small number of provinces ... Guess it won't matter much now :)
Good luck for the end of game :)
Tarrax
November 15th, 2009, 05:36 PM
Ah sad to hear. Thanks for playing. Hope to see you in Tarrax 2! :)
sansanjuan
November 15th, 2009, 10:53 PM
I am going AI this turn : my capital has fallen, my army totals less than twenty hoburg militia and a handful of hoburg priest, and I'm down to only a very small number of provinces ... Guess it won't matter much now :)
Good luck for the end of game :)
Loup,
Good playing with you. See you in another soon,
-ssj
sansanjuan
November 19th, 2009, 10:13 AM
Can we go to 48 hour turns?..
ssj
Tarrax
November 19th, 2009, 10:28 AM
I'll postpone this turn 24 hours and see what people say before changing it on everybody. I understand you have a lot of provinces. :)
sansanjuan
November 19th, 2009, 09:55 PM
I'll postpone this turn 24 hours and see what people say before changing it on everybody. I understand you have a lot of provinces. :)
I started another game too. Bit off a bit too much. Thanks for the postponement. I may get a turn in tonight. I do love the pace. Rare (and here I am saying "uncle!")
-ssj
sansanjuan
November 19th, 2009, 11:56 PM
Got my turn in tonight but tomorrow night is iffy. Could we add 6 hrs to the turn?
-ssj
Tarrax
November 20th, 2009, 08:15 PM
I added 24 hours to this turn as well. Let me know if you need more time.
By the way, for those who are in United States, would you like a break during Thanksgiving week/weekend? I don't need to but I'm just asking to see if there's a need. Let me know your status.
sansanjuan
November 20th, 2009, 08:50 PM
I added 24 hours to this turn as well. Let me know if you need more time.
By the way, for those who are in United States, would you like a break during Thanksgiving week/weekend? I don't need to but I'm just asking to see if there's a need. Let me know your status.
Tx,
Tnx.
I should be good for the Holidays though 30 hrs might be better than 24 to insure a decent midnight window.
-ssj
Tarrax
November 20th, 2009, 09:24 PM
OK, well I am changing the host time to every 30 hours.
Tarrax
November 22nd, 2009, 06:46 PM
Llamaserver seems to be having problems today. So it may not be showing your turn if you sent it. I'll keep an eye on it. Just for your information...
Tarrax
November 22nd, 2009, 10:17 PM
Llamaserver seems to be ok now.
Fantomen
November 23rd, 2009, 07:53 PM
Hear me, Steen, so called "god" of Mictlan, and shiver in fear! Long shall you regret the slaying of our innocent people. The fall of your capital was but the beginning of my vengance. The seas shall be retaken, and the rest of your empire will fall like the house of cards it resembles.
You, who draws your tainted power from weakly human virgins, bloodthirsty and cruel in your sickly excuse for divinity. You, whose physical body now lies in a pool of its own blood like a beggar by the fallen gates. You, who thought of my people, the proud descendants of earths own blood, that it would fall back to the lowliest of human savages.
I sought no war, yet my rage is terrible once awakened. I swear by the Seal, not only to destroy your fickle body, but to erase the very memory of your existance and free your people from your degenerate influence.
I swear by the Seal, and let this curse be the seal of your damnation.
Duracell, God of Agartha.
Tarrax
November 23rd, 2009, 09:19 PM
Wow, sounds like somebody's upset. :) It's a very poetic rant though.
sansanjuan
November 24th, 2009, 02:06 AM
Hear me, Steen, so called "god" of Mictlan, and shiver in fear! Long shall you regret the slaying of our innocent people. The fall of your capital was but the beginning of my vengance. The seas shall be retaken, and the rest of your empire will fall like the house of cards it resembles.
You, who draws your tainted power from weakly human virgins, bloodthirsty and cruel in your sickly excuse for divinity. You, whose physical body now lies in a pool of its own blood like a beggar by the fallen gates. You, who thought of my people, the proud descendants of earths own blood, that it would fall back to the lowliest of human savages.
I sought no war, yet my rage is terrible once awakened. I swear by the Seal, not only to destroy your fickle body, but to erase the very memory of your existance and free your people from your degenerate influence.
I swear by the Seal, and let this curse be the seal of your damnation.
Duracell, God of Agartha.
Very nice.
-ssj
Svamptripp
November 24th, 2009, 05:45 PM
Llamaserver doesn't seem to accept anything from me, not even in my other games. Perhaps it's down. If it doesn't accept it now I must kindly ask for a 12 hour delay.
Tarrax
November 24th, 2009, 08:10 PM
Turn postponed 12 hours.
Svamptripp
November 24th, 2009, 09:57 PM
Thanks...seems like it started to work now. Turn sent in.
Tarrax
November 27th, 2009, 12:52 AM
It looks like Agartha staled. It was Thanksgiving day here in US but since no one asked for an extension, I left the turn as it is. Fantomen, would you like a roll back?
Svamptripp
November 27th, 2009, 01:49 AM
It looks like Agartha staled. It was Thanksgiving day here in US but since no one asked for an extension, I left the turn as it is. Fantomen, would you like a roll back?
Staling is no fun for anyone and I wholeheartily support to rollback if Fantomen wants that.
Fantomen
November 27th, 2009, 03:35 AM
Yes I would like a rollback if it is ok, I thought I had one more day for some reason.
jmb
November 27th, 2009, 02:10 PM
It looks like Agartha staled. It was Thanksgiving day here in US but since no one asked for an extension, I left the turn as it is. Fantomen, would you like a roll back?
Staling is no fun for anyone and I wholeheartily support to rollback if Fantomen wants that.
I have no problem with a rollback either.
sansanjuan
November 27th, 2009, 02:37 PM
It looks like Agartha staled. It was Thanksgiving day here in US but since no one asked for an extension, I left the turn as it is. Fantomen, would you like a roll back?
Ulm is fine with a rollback.
We would then resubmit the last turn? I'll have to see if I can make even bigger tactical blunders this time! :ouch: !
-ssj
Tarrax
November 27th, 2009, 03:59 PM
Ok then I see that there is no problem for the players with a rollback in general. I am rolling back to the last turn. I have never done this before but I would assume we would need to re-submit last turn.
Tarrax
November 27th, 2009, 04:02 PM
The game is rolled back. Please read the info below on the llamaserver about rollbacks. It looks like we need to delete the existing 2h files first:
Tarrax: Roll back to previous turn
This will cause the game to return to the previous turn.
Note that I generally recommend not doing this. The main reason for this is the fact that players have already seen the current turn, and so they know what would happen given the set of moves they used last time. Hence, consciously or not, they are very likely to use this information to change their actions next time they submit a turn. Even assuming none of the players' actions are affected, there will always be a suspicion in the mind of the other players if battles turn out significantly differently. Therefore just in the interest of having the game feel completely fair, I think rollbacks are a bad idea.
A further reason is a difficulty with game file confusion. Imagine turn 10 has just come out, and someone starts to play the turn. Then the game is rolled back to turn 9, and processed again to make a new turn 10. Unless players delete the 2h file they produced from the original turn 10, Dominions will not know to ignore it and may get seriously confused. This can cause a lot of madness, e.g. soldiers becoming commanders and gaining magic paths, and so on. So if you do do a rollback, make sure to remind players to delete their 2h files.
Having said that, there are situations where rollbacks are called for, which is why I've included the option here.
Read this next bit carefully. I seem to be having difficulties explaining it coherently:
Note that once the game is rolled back, it will appear that the game is waiting for 2h files from all players. However, the 2h files from last time the turn was played will in fact be there, and will be used if the game hosts without them being overwritten. This can be useful; often, a game is rehosted in order for only one or two players to retake their turns, while everyone else is expected to make no changes. The game admin can therefore wait till just those players have submitted, and then force hosting. None of the other players will stale (assuming they actually submitted a 2h file last time the turn was played).
I hope all that makes sense!
Tarrax
November 27th, 2009, 04:36 PM
I just re-submitted my turn. We'll see what happens.
sansanjuan
November 27th, 2009, 08:56 PM
I just re-submitted my turn. We'll see what happens.
New territory for me too. Interested to see if my hero reappears.
-ssj
Kref
November 28th, 2009, 05:42 AM
I think previous h2 files should be used. Agartha may send her h2 file. Ulm said: "I'll have to see if I can make even bigger tactical blunders this time!"
At my opinion, ulm lost a castle, also a very important ulm's siege was broken. It weakend him very significantly on a sizeable part of world, so i don't tjink he made some good tactics that turn. It also means that I, and, perhaps, mavreni can suffer great penalties from the fact that ulm watched our actions and their consequences. I won't resent an h2 file for now, and if ulm manage to avoid my and mavreni's results on that turn, i'll consult with mavreni about abandonding this game. Changing ulm's orders may be fatal to mavreni's surviving, and i spent some resouces on mavreni to weaken ulm.
Kref
November 28th, 2009, 06:06 AM
Oh, man, Tarrax, you are mavreni and admin of the game!
I still do not understand how you could make the decision to let Ulm redesign orders for that turn! Well, I'll stay in game, but I don't think it's a fair decision from you to give ulm critical opportunities against you. I planned that your would be able to disturbe ulm but I am not sure you would be capable to do it now.
Kref
November 28th, 2009, 06:07 AM
Oh, man, Tarrax, you are mavreni and admin of the game!
I still do not understand how you could make the decision to let Ulm redesign orders for that turn! Well, I'll stay in game, but I don't think it's a fair decision from you to give ulm critical opportunities against you. I planned that your would be able to disturbe ulm but I am not sure you would be capable to do it now.
P.S. I'll also resent same 2h file.
Kref
November 28th, 2009, 07:35 AM
Well, I've seen the reesults of that ridiculous rolling back. My decision is simple: i am leaving a right for myself to go to AI or redirect a rulership of my nation to anyone on your choice if that would happen once more. I've made and sent turns 33 and 34, it took some time and it's not intresting for me two play similar turns two times, especially when opponent knows what your are going to do, especially if opponent is stronger and so having more options in distributing forces.
In this particular situation the balance of forces was absolutly not so to give ulm the luxurity to remake unsuccsessful turn.
sansanjuan
November 28th, 2009, 11:44 AM
Well, I've seen the reesults of that ridiculous rolling back. My decision is simple: i am leaving a right for myself to go to AI or redirect a rulership of my nation to anyone on your choice if that would happen once more. I've made and sent turns 33 and 34, it took some time and it's not intresting for me two play similar turns two times, especially when opponent knows what your are going to do, especially if opponent is stronger and so having more options in distributing forces.
In this particular situation the balance of forces was absolutly not so to give ulm the luxurity to remake unsuccsessful turn.
K,
I understand your frustration. In reality the rollback both helped and hurt Ulm. I did manage to keep the castle but lost two VERY good random events. You are playing very well and hold an enemy Cap to Ulm's none. I urge you to fight on. Regain momentum with an SC that Ulm will sing songs about (like the White Bull that could not be broken).
-ssj
Tarrax
November 28th, 2009, 02:43 PM
Well I used the same 2h file for re-submitting and actually had not even loaded the 2h file of the stale turn to see what happened. I would have assumed that everybody did the same actions or re-submit the same file but of course I can't enforce that.
I know I am the host but I am just trying to run a fair and fun game and also allow for needs of all players in real time. That's why I offered the rollback. I didn't want to cause any frustration. So I am sorry Kref.
I hope you continue this game which has been fun to me even though I'm not in good position.
As for future rollbacks, it would be nice not to have them of course. So let's say no future rollbacks unless every player explicitly agrees to them here. If you need more time for a turn, let everyone know here and I'll be glad to postpone the turn. Thanks.
Kref
November 28th, 2009, 04:20 PM
I suggest to leave more time for sending turn in future. It's unlikely the player doesn't want to make his turn, so probably something happend, for example there was lost connection to internet. I think it's possible to give for example 3 days to make a turn if suddenly player didn't sent his turn in time. As long as such things happen rarely, I think it's a better solution to wait for a while.
I am staying in the game.
sansanjuan
November 28th, 2009, 04:45 PM
I suggest to leave more time for sending turn in future. It's unlikely the player doesn't want to make his turn, so probably something happend, for example there was lost connection to internet. I think it's possible to give for example 3 days to make a turn if suddenly player didn't sent his turn in time. As long as such things happen rarely, I think it's a better solution to wait for a while.
I am staying in the game.
I agree. May be wise to even turn off quick-host. This crew is very good about getting turns in.
-ssj
sansanjuan
November 28th, 2009, 10:56 PM
I suggest to leave more time for sending turn in future. It's unlikely the player doesn't want to make his turn, so probably something happend, for example there was lost connection to internet. I think it's possible to give for example 3 days to make a turn if suddenly player didn't sent his turn in time. As long as such things happen rarely, I think it's a better solution to wait for a while.
I am staying in the game.
I agree. May be wise to even turn off quick-host. This crew is very good about getting turns in.
-ssj
:doh: Meant to say quickhost on with unlimited time limit.... which I think Kref was alluding to.
-ssj
Fantomen
December 1st, 2009, 07:50 PM
Sorry for causing a delay, and thank you Tarrax for postponing.
I would like the timer set a bit longer like 48h now, what do others think?
sansanjuan
December 1st, 2009, 09:02 PM
48 would be fine with me.
-ssj
Tarrax
December 2nd, 2009, 11:24 AM
48h is also fine with me but I'll wait to hear from everybody until I make the change. Meanwhile I'll keep postponing the turn 6-8 hours if it seems like someone is going to stale.
jmb
December 2nd, 2009, 05:57 PM
48h is also fine with me but I'll wait to hear from everybody until I make the change. Meanwhile I'll keep postponing the turn 6-8 hours if it seems like someone is going to stale.
I'm ok with 48h too.
Fantomen
December 2nd, 2009, 06:13 PM
From the look of my last turn, I'll be dead soon. Grinded to dust between Mictlan and Arcocephale. So please ignore my vote for longer turns.
Tarrax
December 2nd, 2009, 08:03 PM
So this is it for me. Ulm's wave of warriors was too much for my bull. My mages were scattered around the stream lands. Marverni is defeated!
Kref
December 3rd, 2009, 04:16 AM
Well, due to Ulm I do not have much provinces or forces to govern right now, so I generally would be able to make turns in 24 hours. I understand that it can take a much time to rule huge empires so I have nothing against 48 hours for one turn.
Also I stay on my suggestion not to make turns until everybody would sent 2h files.
sansanjuan
December 4th, 2009, 01:09 AM
So this is it for me. Ulm's wave of warriors was too much for my bull. My mages were scattered around the stream lands. Marverni is defeated!
The White Bull will live in Legend.
Though Shunt the Pretender of Ulm is loath to admit it... Buyuk the White Bull could have wiped his hinder in toe to toe combat.
-ssj
Fantomen
December 4th, 2009, 09:32 PM
Agartha yields to superior force, good work Arco and Mictlan!
Thanks to all for playing with me and special thanks to Tarrax for his most exellent admining.
jmb
December 11th, 2009, 06:31 PM
I've just sent my turn 47. However, I will be away this week-end and beginning of next week. Would it be possible to delay hosting for turn 48 until Tuesday night, please?
Thanks,
Tarrax
December 11th, 2009, 08:22 PM
Turn 48 postponed by 48 hours at jmb's request.
jmb
December 15th, 2009, 05:33 PM
Turn 48 postponed by 48 hours at jmb's request.
Thanks, but it looks like it didn't work and the turn hosted anyway :(
Tarrax
December 15th, 2009, 08:55 PM
Sorry to hear. That is odd. I postponed for 48 hours which had postponed the game until 09:00 GMT on Tuesday. Maybe you didn't mean GMT? It always helps to specify hour and timezone instead of day/night.
jmb
December 16th, 2009, 03:08 PM
Sorry to hear. That is odd. I postponed for 48 hours which had postponed the game until 09:00 GMT on Tuesday. Maybe you didn't mean GMT? It always helps to specify hour and timezone instead of day/night.
Well, according to the times of the turns I received, turn 48 was sent on Saturday at 10 AM, then I staled for turns 49 and 50 which were sent on Sunday at 4 PM and on Tuesday at 10 AM respectively, so it seems something went wrong with the postponement :(
Tarrax
December 16th, 2009, 08:26 PM
I only postponed turn 48 for 48 hours. You realize when a turn hosts, it resets the turn period to default (24 hours), right? Maybe that's what happened. Turn 48 hosted during the weekend (which means everybody including you must have sent files). I didn't do additional postponing for turn 49 since you said you'll be back on Tuesday for turn 48.
sansanjuan
December 17th, 2009, 08:34 AM
Sorry to hear. That is odd. I postponed for 48 hours which had postponed the game until 09:00 GMT on Tuesday. Maybe you didn't mean GMT? It always helps to specify hour and timezone instead of day/night.
Well, according to the times of the turns I received, turn 48 was sent on Saturday at 10 AM, then I staled for turns 49 and 50 which were sent on Sunday at 4 PM and on Tuesday at 10 AM respectively, so it seems something went wrong with the postponement :(
JMB,
That is a bummer. I will let you retake 7 and 17 from AI Agartha (I was going to take them this turn). Not much but hope that takes some sting out.
-ssj
jmb
December 17th, 2009, 06:03 PM
I only postponed turn 48 for 48 hours. You realize when a turn hosts, it resets the turn period to default (24 hours), right? Maybe that's what happened. Turn 48 hosted during the weekend (which means everybody including you must have sent files). I didn't do additional postponing for turn 49 since you said you'll be back on Tuesday for turn 48.
Yeah, that's probably what it was: a misunderstanding on which turn I wanted delayed :(
jmb
December 17th, 2009, 06:04 PM
Sorry to hear. That is odd. I postponed for 48 hours which had postponed the game until 09:00 GMT on Tuesday. Maybe you didn't mean GMT? It always helps to specify hour and timezone instead of day/night.
Well, according to the times of the turns I received, turn 48 was sent on Saturday at 10 AM, then I staled for turns 49 and 50 which were sent on Sunday at 4 PM and on Tuesday at 10 AM respectively, so it seems something went wrong with the postponement :(
JMB,
That is a bummer. I will let you retake 7 and 17 from AI Agartha (I was going to take them this turn). Not much but hope that takes some sting out.
-ssj
Thanks, I appreciate it.
sansanjuan
December 20th, 2009, 07:06 PM
Let it be said the giants of Fomoria fought as living legends, standing fast to the last giant. Ulm's nose was bloodied repeatedly by a handful of mages that would not yield a eyelash defending their capital. There became a sense of delicious frustration as repeated castle stormings were turned back by clever tactics. Attrition finally swung the campaign after many failed breach attempts. Then, against all odds, a lone Fomorian scout captured a remote territory single handedly the turn the capital fell. The scout defeated an Ulm commander, swordsman and archer with viscious skill. His name is engraved next to Ulm's own heros in the Capital Hall of Heroes.
-Entri
Scribe of Shunt
Kref
December 21st, 2009, 04:44 AM
Congratulations for Ulm!
Fighting his forces gave me valuable experience in general and in Fomorian strategies.
It would be intresting to see the result of this game )
Stagger Lee
December 21st, 2009, 10:19 AM
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=41304&page=18
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=44537
Svamptripp was r'lyeh. It looks like he's about to stale his fifth consecutive turn here. If you have any info PM Quitti. If you need a sub, post for one. I might be interested after Christmas, but I can't add another game right now.
Thought you guys should know.
sansanjuan
December 21st, 2009, 01:59 PM
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=41304&page=18
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=44537
Svamptripp was r'lyeh. It looks like he's about to stale his fifth consecutive turn here. If you have any info PM Quitti. If you need a sub, post for one. I might be interested after Christmas, but I can't add another game right now.
Thought you guys should know.
He's right. Mictlan needs a sub. Perhaos even Kref or Tarrax. Going against a blood nation (eventually) will be very very nasty...
-ssj
jmb
December 22nd, 2009, 06:20 AM
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=41304&page=18
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=44537
Svamptripp was r'lyeh. It looks like he's about to stale his fifth consecutive turn here. If you have any info PM Quitti. If you need a sub, post for one. I might be interested after Christmas, but I can't add another game right now.
Thought you guys should know.
He's right. Mictlan needs a sub. Perhaos even Kref or Tarrax. Going against a blood nation (eventually) will be very very nasty...
-ssj
I think we should pause the game until we hear from Svamptripp or find a sub for Mictlan. Otherwise, we might as well declare the game to be over with Ulm as the winner, since I certainly can't win at this point...
Tarrax
December 22nd, 2009, 07:31 AM
I postponed the turn for 7 days (I will keep postponing until we find a sub). I also changed the title of this thread to show we are looking for a sub. We'll see how it goes.
Hurmio
December 22nd, 2009, 08:08 AM
Hello,
i see that you are looking for a sub. I'm up for that. I'm sure i count as a newbie, since i've mostly played dom1 a few years back. I recently got interested again and bought the dom3. I've played some single player games and now i'd like to try some multiplayer ones.
sansanjuan
December 22nd, 2009, 10:40 AM
Hello,
i see that you are looking for a sub. I'm up for that. I'm sure i count as a newbie, since i've mostly played dom1 a few years back. I recently got interested again and bought the dom3. I've played some single player games and now i'd like to try some multiplayer ones.
Hurmio,
Welcome back to the fold.
-ssj
Tarrax
December 23rd, 2009, 07:26 AM
Hurmio,
Please PM me your e-mail address so I can add you to the game.
Kref
December 24th, 2009, 05:06 AM
I also won't refuse to try to punch Ulm as Mictlan )
I'll sent my email to tarrax in case if Hurnio won't start to play Mictlan for some reasons.
Tarrax
December 24th, 2009, 06:55 AM
Hurmio,
Welcome to the game. I changed Mictlan's e-mail address to yours. Request a turn resend from the game page to get the turn: http://www.llamaserver.net/gameinfo.cgi?game=Tarrax
Kref,
If we need a sub again, you'll be the first.
Tarrax
December 27th, 2009, 06:58 AM
I PM'd Svamptripp and asked for his game password. I haven't received a reply yet. I'll let you know as soon as I receive a reply but I'm not sure what to do if he doesn't reply.
sansanjuan
December 27th, 2009, 10:45 AM
I PM'd Svamptripp and asked for his game password. I haven't received a reply yet. I'll let you know as soon as I receive a reply but I'm not sure what to do if he doesn't reply.
T,
You may want to pose that question on the main thread. I'm sure it has happened before.
-ssj
Tarrax
December 31st, 2009, 07:44 AM
Current status:
I sent the game password to Hurmio but he said it doesn't work. I'll try to contact lch.
Tarrax
January 2nd, 2010, 06:11 AM
Hurmio was able to sub for Svamptripp so we are back to normal schedule now. I'll postpone the turn 24 hours just in case.
Hurmio
January 5th, 2010, 10:32 AM
Hi,
would it be possible to delay today's hosting? I won't be able to play my turn in time, because of the Epiphany. A 24h delay would be great, if possible.
Hurmio
January 5th, 2010, 05:53 PM
Nevermind,
i managed to play the turn in time.
Hurmio
January 8th, 2010, 06:22 AM
Nasty Tartarians, we hates them!
Anyway, i think i need more time to play the turns. Is it possible to swich to 48h hosting cycle or skip the friday and saturday hostings? Ofcourse, if you guys oppose this, i can manage the turns as they come. I'd just like to have some more time for them.
Hurmio
sansanjuan
January 8th, 2010, 07:58 AM
Nasty Tartarians, we hates them!
Anyway, i think i need more time to play the turns. Is it possible to swich to 48h hosting cycle or skip the friday and saturday hostings? Ofcourse, if you guys oppose this, i can manage the turns as they come. I'd just like to have some more time for them.
Hurmio
H,
I copy and second that... ;)
-ssj
jmb
January 8th, 2010, 02:20 PM
Nasty Tartarians, we hates them!
Anyway, i think i need more time to play the turns. Is it possible to swich to 48h hosting cycle or skip the friday and saturday hostings? Ofcourse, if you guys oppose this, i can manage the turns as they come. I'd just like to have some more time for them.
Hurmio
H,
I copy and second that... ;)
-ssj
No problem from me.
Tarrax
January 8th, 2010, 08:11 PM
Hosting interval changed to 48 hours.
Hurmio
January 9th, 2010, 04:45 AM
Hosting interval changed to 48 hours.
Thanks!
Hurmio
sansanjuan
January 19th, 2010, 09:56 AM
A long standing non-aggression pact was shattered as war mongering Arco killed Ulmish innocents without warning in the heart of Ulm's territory.
"They were beautiful ladies but they killed us all!.. um. Except for me! " said one shocked peasant who had approached the visiting mages in hopes of selling his stunted rutabagas.
"Dressed to kill 'dey was 'an dey did!" said a toothless fishmonger.
The attacks have energized a reluctant, peace loving Ulmish populace into war footing.
- Ulm Ministry of Propaganda
jmb
January 19th, 2010, 06:05 PM
Ha! The well named "Ulm Ministry of Propaganda" doesn't lack for cheek calling themselves "reluctant" to go to war and "peace loving". We are sure the ghosts of the people of Marverni, Fomoria, and Sauromatia would have something to say about that, along with all the murdered innocents in Mictlan. Our noble leaders have decided that Arcoscephale could not stand by and let this blight overrun the free world and our glorious agents and troops have struck a major blow into the very heart of Ulm's conquests.
Freedom shall prevail!
- Archimedes, Minister of Information, for Thebaios
Tarrax
January 19th, 2010, 09:20 PM
Ooo sounds like trouble brewing to me. :)
jmb
January 27th, 2010, 06:48 PM
Well,I think we might as well call it a day and declare sansanjuan the winner. Unless either of you wants to draw it to the bitter end?
sansanjuan
January 27th, 2010, 07:18 PM
Well,I think we might as well call it a day and declare sansanjuan the winner. Unless either of you wants to draw it to the bitter end?
I'm easy either way (though my 2 hr turns are driving the wife to distraction... ;) .
-ssj
Hurmio
January 30th, 2010, 02:23 PM
Thanks for the fun! It was nice trying out a new nation in the end game. I got butchered pretty fast, but i don't mind.
sansanjuan
January 30th, 2010, 05:52 PM
Thanks for the fun! It was nice trying out a new nation in the end game. I got butchered pretty fast, but i don't mind.
Hurmio,
You played very well from a tough starting position. I have new found respect for devils (as my dead tarts can attest to). Those Tzitzimtl (sp?) were absolutely astounding tart killers. I finally figured out I needed a ring of poison to get to poison 200 so after invulnerability my poison resist would still be 100%. I think the Tz devils were most effective when you had them attack on the first turn before tart's buffs had kicked in. If you had even one more I probably would still be fighting them. Odd that the game said "Ulm routs" and my Tart kept fighting.. May post on that. I shudder to think what a half dozen raiding parties with 5 or six Tzs in each would do.
-ssj
jmb : Per your earlier thread let me know if you want to play on. I understand if you want to keep going and try out some new tactics. That said my other game is getting "hot" and I wouldn't mind devoting more time to it.
jmb
January 31st, 2010, 05:27 PM
jmb : Per your earlier thread let me know if you want to play on. I understand if you want to keep going and try out some new tactics. That said my other game is getting "hot" and I wouldn't mind devoting more time to it.
No, that's ok we can stop here. Congratulations and thanks everyone for a great game.
Tarrax
January 31st, 2010, 07:12 PM
So it looks like we have a winner. Congratulations sansanjuan. I'd like to thank everyone who played. I hope to see everyone in Tarrax2! I might organize that soon.
sansanjuan
January 31st, 2010, 09:24 PM
jmb : Per your earlier thread let me know if you want to play on. I understand if you want to keep going and try out some new tactics. That said my other game is getting "hot" and I wouldn't mind devoting more time to it.
No, that's ok we can stop here. Congratulations and thanks everyone for a great game.
JMB,
Your "Ladies" gave me fits :shock: . It would have been risky but I wonder if you would have risked single raiders and hit more territories in the initial surprise attack (the overall strategy was excellent in any event).
I found I had little chance raiding you as your flying PD smeared my stealthy test raiders before they could light up any buffs..
Did you have fog warriors researched? That is an excellent spell for the air queen and would have made the magma kids very very tough.
Great game all. I learned a lot from all of you. Let me know if anyone wants a turn file.
-ssj
jmb
February 1st, 2010, 06:40 PM
Your "Ladies" gave me fits :shock: . It would have been risky but I wonder if you would have risked single raiders and hit more territories in the initial surprise attack
Well, I tried that against the AI and I found that losses were very high when using them singly. The best compromise appears to be to use them in pairs, which can take out most reasonable PD plus the odd roving commander and bodyguard.
(the overall strategy was excellent in any event).
Thanks :) Too little, too late unfortunately.
I found I had little chance raiding you as your flying PD smeared my stealthy test raiders before they could light up any buffs..
Did you have fog warriors researched? That is an excellent spell for the air queen and would have made the magma kids very very tough.
Actually, I had just about maxed out the research in everything but blood. OTOH, it was the first game where I really reached late game (not counting SP which is too easy by that point) so I'm not really familiar with the truly powerful spells and tactics.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.