.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

BCT Commander- Save $8.00
winSPWW2- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 25 of 112
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: Wish
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs October 5th, 2006, 01:52 AM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: New proposition

yeah i'm kinda losing interest in it too.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs September 29th, 2006, 02:43 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: New proposition

did you get my turn way back when?
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs September 8th, 2006, 02:15 AM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: email change

wow

time sure flies
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs September 6th, 2006, 08:35 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: email change

You send the turns, I'll play it when I get it.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs September 5th, 2006, 10:49 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: email change

chances are nothing is available.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs September 5th, 2006, 06:28 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: email change

well about a war between us, but not about the loophole.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs September 3rd, 2006, 03:00 AM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: email change

its certainly a loophole to the "no stealth attacks without council approval" portion of the charter. how would his attacking my castle work towards his attackability under prop 39?
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs September 2nd, 2006, 10:34 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: email change

whats the rule when a large sneaking army takes out patrolling forces, thus putting them in siege of the castle of the province?

I know the province is clearly contested (by the charter,) but am I...
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs August 22nd, 2006, 01:26 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Proposition 50

cainehill, you mean like in the above quote, which you managed to past after at some point?

the council cannot be held responsible for your own irresponsibility.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs August 14th, 2006, 05:38 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Schedule

yikes.

quite a misunderstanding. What precedent would this have to make a new clarification retroactive against past misunderstandings without explicitely stating as such?
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs August 14th, 2006, 02:49 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Schedule

I read the propr, and nowhere in it does it say that pasha is rogue. It only deals with what it means to be rogue...

explain what you mean.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs August 13th, 2006, 02:49 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Schedule

going rogue clearly means that you have neither the protections, not the privileges of the council, or any of its propositions.

it is essential ex-communication
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs August 12th, 2006, 11:25 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Schedule

unless you get a prop passed prior to attacking to nullify 39
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs August 2nd, 2006, 02:29 AM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Schedule

I will play my turns as I get them. so any time frame works for me.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs July 25th, 2006, 02:09 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Hold up

yeah, I don't want this game to die.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs July 15th, 2006, 05:39 AM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: farewell, Ronan

is there a hold up on this game? I am not recieving turns.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs July 7th, 2006, 01:59 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: farewell, Ronan

man shadow vestals are insanely easy to banish. at least in my tests with them.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs July 5th, 2006, 07:14 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: farewell, Ronan

they tried a dragon one, but only half the players do their turns, and the senate has not passed anything, infact there is no real structure, just a quiet and enduring peace accord between all...
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs June 26th, 2006, 10:25 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Proposition 46

yeah it does read that way, on further investigation. I totally read it wrong.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs June 26th, 2006, 01:26 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Proposition 46

"that voted in favor of this proposition." Ermor voted AGAINST the proposition.

though he has a prop up, currently, to rectify his no vote, so maybe in the future it will be legal, I'm not sure...
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs June 25th, 2006, 09:10 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Proposition 46

one should note, since ermor voted no, they are not attackable under prop 39.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs June 25th, 2006, 05:28 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Proposition 46

it would indeed make him rogue
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs June 19th, 2006, 01:12 AM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Proposition 46

btw I want it to be known that I did not seige C'Tis' capitol and thus am not targetable via prop 39, One of my sneaky types were found, and subsequently won.
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs June 14th, 2006, 09:31 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Do the propositions ever stop?

eh, I do not wish to war against c'tis and vanhiem and welcome all comers like ermor does. I just don't want to see all that wonderful c'tisian land fall to such as ermor, who already has plenty of...
Forum: Multiplayer & AARs June 14th, 2006, 03:41 PM
Replies: 1,411
Views: 128,441
Posted By Wish
Re: Do the propositions ever stop?

The summary of the proposition is that Jotunhiem wants in on the C'Tis war action (http://yarnspinners.improbable.org/Wyrms/index.php?title=Proposition45)
Showing results 1 to 25 of 112

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.