.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
World Supremacy- Save $9.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 25 of 104
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: Siddhi
Forum: TO&Es March 21st, 2007, 10:01 AM
Replies: 6
Views: 1,228
Posted By Siddhi
Re: New Chinese RPG smallest ever

not that i have any particular inclination of providing free input anymore, but to help PK and Shan with their great work:

new themobaric warhead for the RPG-7

From Jane's (abridged):
...
Forum: TO&Es March 18th, 2007, 09:47 AM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Re: Jaegerkompanie added...

If "space" is really the issue, would it be sufficent not to upload any files until there is a finished product? Hard to imagine text taking up that much space - there is little activity on these...
Forum: TO&Es March 16th, 2007, 01:18 PM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Re: Jaegerkompanie added...

AMX: thanks for the input

Andy, the reason we are doing it this way is not only for ease of communication but also to be open to other contributions, both in terms of SPMBT gameplay as well as...
Forum: TO&Es March 16th, 2007, 11:00 AM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Re: Jaegerkompanie added...

clusterammo: you're right, I checked (didn't think we have it!) m84/155mm, so should be included.

you know, if you did fire the 9mm then it was the PAR67 (same here), but i was told then and...
Forum: TO&Es March 16th, 2007, 07:25 AM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Re: Jaegerkompanie added...

Excellent Shan, PK please have a look, I will be unable to do so until sunday at the earliest (and with luck) but you have given enough info.

your changes and formations seem completly sensible...
Forum: TO&Es March 16th, 2007, 07:00 AM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Re: Jagdkamp!

well they prolly should not have "hand to hand" bonus, but should be less "visible", therefore perhaps all as "scout" class?

i'm not sure about giving them any malus on experience, as they really...
Forum: TO&Es March 15th, 2007, 12:16 PM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Jagdkamp!

"Jagdkampf"
The "Jagdkampf" units (not to be confused with the "Jagdkommando" Commando troops)were specilaly trained "local" milita soldiers that were part of specific defence territories that...
Forum: TO&Es March 15th, 2007, 06:45 AM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Re: Vehicles...

Generally I am for the Company transport having a seperate "Company Transport" section if we cannot cover all the units organically. The problem is this is the real OOB (for that time) with already...
Forum: TO&Es March 14th, 2007, 02:16 PM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Landwehr etc.

The "ZugTrupp" is the Platoon command section, not support, so the first unit of the platoon.

The Support platoon is the Company Heavy weapons platoon, called (then) "S-Zug" (Schwere Jäger -...
Forum: TO&Es March 13th, 2007, 12:10 PM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Re: \"Garde\" (Gaurd) BN and \"Ehrengard\" (Honor Gaurd)Co

Btw regarding intergrated CG into squad, very rare as SOP for both LAW and CG is to fire two at a target, b/c if you miss things get a bit hot...the new BH2010 is putting the CG into the squad, which...
Forum: TO&Es March 13th, 2007, 12:04 PM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Re: \"Garde\" (Gaurd) BN and \"Ehrengard\" (Honor Gaurd)Co

Um pretty sure that the Miniman should be the PAR67, the PAR70 is the M72A2. They are so similar in appearence that it is confusing, also, during basic sometimes recruits shot the par67 as we are...
Forum: TO&Es March 13th, 2007, 08:13 AM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
\"Garde\" (Gaurd) BN and \"Ehrengard\" (Honor Gaurd)Co

My perfered solution for the above mentioned problem of too many units for the jäger platoon:

- 1 sniper as marksman in the platoon command section (slot 2), 1 sniper independant

- M2HMG...
Forum: TO&Es March 12th, 2007, 08:38 AM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Re: Austrian OOB, old and new

hi chaps a lot of really good discussion here, i will summarise the key points FMPOV.

- the three units i have shown is the "actual" and official OOB for the periods in question, this is derived...
Forum: TO&Es March 9th, 2007, 12:44 PM
Replies: 38
Views: 4,284
Posted By Siddhi
Austrian OOB, old and new

this post is primarily for Plasmakrab and Shan as the PM is a pain, others are welcome to comments but some info has been covered by PM already. It will be mulitpart.

The following can be used the...
Forum: TO&Es March 8th, 2007, 10:24 AM
Replies: 21
Views: 2,385
Posted By Siddhi
Re: new S Korean tank...

heck, if it really has that RoF, has the active anti arty capability (which the US pioneered ages ago) and all the rest of those gadgets i take my sarcasm back...it does sound pretty good. still...
Forum: TO&Es March 7th, 2007, 07:09 AM
Replies: 21
Views: 2,385
Posted By Siddhi
Re: new S Korean tank...

here's a pic of a model of a K2 with fording equipment. does that snorkel look familiar or what?
Forum: TO&Es March 7th, 2007, 07:05 AM
Replies: 21
Views: 2,385
Posted By Siddhi
Re: new S Korean tank...

it does not look that "Hi-tech"
this is from Jane's (JAA) Nov. 2006 (exerpted b/c of copyright)

In addition to having a very advanced passive armour package over the frontal arc, the K2 MBT is...
Forum: Campaigns, Scenarios & Maps February 20th, 2007, 12:01 PM
Replies: 13
Views: 2,301
Posted By Siddhi
Re: WW3 campaigns for the Soviets?

this sounds wicked, and small-sized, too! are these naval scouts "naval speznatz" (if the poles even had such a unit?). nice heavy FO activity, maybe? i am looking forward to it! bring it on!
Forum: WinSPMBT February 20th, 2007, 11:54 AM
Replies: 18
Views: 1,750
Posted By Siddhi
Re: v2.5 scenarios not running on v3.0

thanks chaps, all problems addressed. still have not had the chance to to check the probs with my custom scenario not running but it seems similar to the "missing phillipino SF squads" we mentioned,...
Forum: Campaigns, Scenarios & Maps February 19th, 2007, 08:45 AM
Replies: 13
Views: 2,301
Posted By Siddhi
Re: WW3 campaigns for the Soviets?

i would welcome such a campaign, especially the time frame in question and if it is max a company as core strength
Forum: WinSPMBT February 19th, 2007, 08:39 AM
Replies: 18
Views: 1,750
Posted By Siddhi
Re: v2.5 scenarios not running on v3.0

Don, fixing the values and saving it in a different slot did not work, plus I found some other wierd probs - i'm think uninstall/ reinstall completly. a quick description to show you what i am...
Forum: WinSPMBT February 16th, 2007, 10:33 AM
Replies: 18
Views: 1,750
Posted By Siddhi
Re: v2.5 scenarios not running on v3.0

very interesting DRG, thanks for that, i will have a go at restoring the Kurassier AAMG rating to HE (i put AP as they are in fact armed with AP, I did notice that in other OOBs AAMG also have HE but...
Forum: WinSPMBT February 15th, 2007, 05:54 PM
Replies: 18
Views: 1,750
Posted By Siddhi
Re: v2.5 scenario not running on v3.0

fair enough.
here's the file; units that should appear on turn 2 mounted in BTRs (on Sov AI side) appear without BTRs (although BTR is indicated on the formation screen.
appreciate the help.
S
Forum: WinSPMBT February 15th, 2007, 09:56 AM
Replies: 18
Views: 1,750
Posted By Siddhi
Re: v2.5 scenario not running on v3.0

acutally not, I have recieved two PMs on this matter, however both mention the fix you suggested as having been succesfull - unfortunatly it does not work for me at all.

i would very much...
Forum: WinSPMBT February 14th, 2007, 12:34 PM
Replies: 18
Views: 1,750
Posted By Siddhi
Re: v2.5 scenario not running on v3.0

as i said, it is a custom scenario (i.e. i made it), and it uses the standard 2.5 OOB

it worked perfectly well on 2.5 and is totally nuts on 3.0. i have no idea why this is, as i invested a lot...
Showing results 1 to 25 of 104

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.