Re: OT: Gravity, Dark Energy, Universal expansion
Dark Matter and Dark Energy are bad science... they are no more than the flying spaghetti monster outside religion.
Basic Logic dictates something the *fudge* is wrong...
Gravity was confirmed because everywhere in the universe we looked, things behaved as gravity predicted.
Dark Matter is now confirmed because everywhere in the universe we look, things do not behave as gravity predicted.
That reasoning is Paris Hilton daft... and people are getting PhD's for it.
It is important to note:
distances and velocities in astrophysics are not beyond question... lots of assumptions, and simplifications, with little attention to other factors that could skew the results. I would question these long before adding new material to universal model.
Also, has anyone bothered to measure the net charge of a galaxy? or the interaction with the galactic magnetic field with the extragalactic wind? Gravity isn't alone in the universe...
Dark Energy is worse... especially with that horrid little article that made the news, about a tipping point where all matter would fly apart at the speed of light. Total nonsense, that 'theory' claimed a density of dark energy that resulted in more dark energy as the universe expanded. Poppycock! Space having an inherent density of anything violates relativity, since volume is not a constant in all reference frames.
*grumble*
|