Quote:
Xietor said:
As someone who will be an attorney one day K, my advice is to pay attention and abide by the language of the contract. The precise words of a contract usually trump the elusive "spirit" of the agreement.
When a lawyer shows up in court trying to rely on the "spirit" of the contract, rather than the plain words written on paper, you know he is in trouble. Unless the lawyer goes fishing with the Judge on weekends.
|
Show me the wording of the NAP agreement, and I'll argue the precise wording. Considering that most players' agreements consist of "wanna NAP-3?", we have to address what is "Aggression."
Let's take a vote. Which ones do people consider aggression?
-Taking provinces behind a third party's attack, so that regardless of whether an attacker is successful or not in his attack, you have lost provinces.
-Cutting off your attack on an aggressor by taking enemy provinces in your way, blocking your attack or movement.
-Attacking Bogus if he pops in your provinces.
-Dropping ritual spells onto provinces you are likely to enter.
-Giving gems, gold, or items to your enemy.
-Dropping anonymous spells into your provinces.
-Sending stealthy SCs through your territory to be "caught"
-teleporting in an army into a province you suspect they will enter.
-casting a global that injures you.
-pushing their potentially harmful dominion into yours by
A. Temples
B. Sacrifices/prophets
C. Stealth preachers/stealth heretics
-holding large armies next to your border.