Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeraaa
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronDuke99
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio_rocks
Hmmm... You are aware that ALL NATO countries deployed troops in Afghanistan?
|
Yep, many of them not very many men and with limited orders -from their Governments/high command- to actually do very much, Canada being an honourable exception. |
True that. For example, we deployed a mixed engineer/medical company that didn't leave Kabul at all and stayed most of the time at the international airport. So our contribution was pretty much symbolic (although, despite our government's best efforts to keep the troops out of firefights, some soldiers were engaged by the attacking Talibans in spring of 2012 when the attacked Kabul, fortuntely with no casualties from our side). Others did deploy troops in combat, but with the mindset of not having casualties at all, essentially making operations with them difficult. Anyway, the willingness in the coaltion wasn't particularly high, which is Ironduke's point I assume and frankly there is no evidence that NATO countries that aren't directly threatened (like the Baltic States, maybe Poland as well) will show much eagerness to fight with Russia. |
Very much my point.
I believe the German troops, for example, did not do much in the way of night patrols (kind of important in a military campaign). The troops from Canada fought hard. The relatively few troops from Australia and New Zealand fought hard (Check out the losses). Also bear in mind, as Suhiir pointed out on another thread, most nations have some good, elite units, how good the rest of that nations armed forces are depends...
Allied casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan (These first are dead).
http://icasualties.org/