View Single Post
  #28  
Old February 1st, 2010, 01:57 PM
rfisher's Avatar

rfisher rfisher is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Posts: 65
Thanks: 20
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
rfisher is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Suhiir's Revised USMC OOB #13

Hello, I have nothing clever or insightful to say about your OOB as I only have a casual interest in these things, but I am certainly enjoying it!
It really shows that you actually know what the guys are using and aren't simply having to rely on educated guessing.

So, could you humour a noob level question?
What do the acronyms SOC and CTJF stand for?

And also, the standard tank company (present day and near future) has roughly 50% close support tanks in it. I assume this is because that is the usual load-out for the sort of deployments the USMC sees in 'real life'.
However, if they were to be faced with a more armoured foe, would that change their load out to a more anti-armour role and if so should that therefore be an option in the game too?

That is a genuine question and not an opinion, in that for all I know about these things ATGMs are the future of anti tank warfare and therefore the load out would be the same for the tanks but they would bring more AT-LAVs?
Reply With Quote