Any word?

[Rogue]

I was hoping to hear some news of how the testing on this was going. Heh, I know that not much can be said about specifics, but I was hoping for a, "sweet system, very easy to learn" or something along those lines. I've read the (publiclly) available material on this and I'm very interested in it.

I'm actually interested in swaying my wife into paper and pencil gaming and I think this system might be the ticket. Not to hard to pick up on for a beginner, but good for a long term project (easy to add complexity).

Anyway, no specifics or getting anyone in trouble. I'm just curious and hopefull is all.

[Tonio_Loewald]

I'm uploading a new draft of the rules today.

I can't speak as to timing, but the rules are in a very good state. The changes being made now are very much in the form of tiny bits of polish (I'm trying to pay a LOT of attention to the wording of key rules ... so things like the wording of the rules for "waiting" get a lot of attention.)

Note: *waiting* is a combat rule that generalises out concepts such as opportunity fire.

[Rogue]

Thank you for the info! I definitely understand how the wording goes. I can remember hearing an argument over the following line:

"In the terms of the contract, you may return the defective product to us."

Is may being used as in "you might, or might not" or as in you have permission. I actually sat in on a meeting some years back when this came up while discussion contract work.

So that said, by all means apply the polish!!!

[G. K. Zhukov]

Howdy All.

Is there anything new regarding publication of ForeSight?

Lack of nows since 2006 seems to indicate the project could have been scrapped... Please tell me it has not.

Thanks in advance!