|
|
|
|
| Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|
August 28th, 2005, 04:18 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,261
Thanks: 3,814
Thanked 5,423 Times in 2,694 Posts
|
|
Re: What Changes in the CD Version
Quote:
Artur said:
The abrams is worth much more than 2T72s could you adjust there values like that so an Abrams / T72 point ratio would be 3:1? Vis>= 40 > +80 pts, range finder +40 pts etc...
Artur.
|
In GAME terms that is very close to what I have have now. An Iraqi RG T-72A costs 194 points with the new calculations and that is with the 10 morale and 10 experience boost the RG units get.
An M1A2 costs 531 and four companies of RG T-72's can be bought for the same cost as 4 platoons of M1A2's. That adds up to 44 T-72's vs 16 M1A2's which is pretty close to 3:1
( and that may make you happy but I can promise someone else won't be )
Don
__________________
If you find you are constantly reacting to your enemy's tactics instead forcing the enemy to react to yours, you are losing the battle....
|
August 28th, 2005, 04:50 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Budapest
Posts: 403
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: What Changes in the CD Version
Quote:
DRG said:
Quote:
Artur said:
The abrams is worth much more than 2T72s could you adjust there values like that so an Abrams / T72 point ratio would be 3:1? Vis>= 40 > +80 pts, range finder +40 pts etc...
Artur.
|
In GAME terms that is very close to what I have have now. An Iraqi RG T-72A costs 194 points with the new calculations and that is with the 10 morale and 10 experience boost the RG units get.
An M1A2 costs 531 and four companies of RG T-72's can be bought for the same cost as 4 platoons of M1A2's. That adds up to 44 T-72's vs 16 M1A2's which is pretty close to 3:1
( and that may make you happy but I can promise someone else won't be )
Don
|
Guys I am speachless. I never ever had contact with developers that were so open and so ready for hearing player feedback. As I am a software engineer I appreciate that even more. (I know some features are very hard to implement and some are very easy to do ).
I had 4 comments
-formation deletion bug
-fortified hex reentry
-cost issues
-helos hit by rifle effect
and 3 were accepted. Way to go guys.
Maybe one day you will find out something about this helo issue to make the Vietnam war fans happy.  BTW is that realistic that helos are so vulnerable to rifle fire?
Artur.
__________________
"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.", Sun Tzu
|
August 29th, 2005, 02:09 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kladno, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,176
Thanks: 12
Thanked 49 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Re: What Changes in the CD Version
Quote:
Artur said:
BTW is that realistic that helos are so vulnerable to rifle fire?
|
IIRC in Afghanistan one Hind was downed by a lucky Mujaheddin who'se 7.62x39mm bullet went through some soft place in the cockpit and killed (or seriously wounded) pilot.
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
|
August 29th, 2005, 04:32 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 84
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What Changes in the CD Version
Just got back from holiday and spent a good 20 minutes going thought this post reading about all the changes. As I went from post to post, my jaw just kept dropping further and further....
Excellent work, cant wait.
|
August 29th, 2005, 06:28 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,261
Thanks: 3,814
Thanked 5,423 Times in 2,694 Posts
|
|
Re: What Changes in the CD Version
Once we issue the patch we start work on WinSPWW2 and once we start on WinSPWW2 there will be very little time for further work on WinSPMBT so this patch is a big one becasue of that
Don
__________________
If you find you are constantly reacting to your enemy's tactics instead forcing the enemy to react to yours, you are losing the battle....
|
August 31st, 2005, 02:08 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Germoney, Siegen
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What Changes in the CD Version
well i also think most changes seem to be good.
|
September 5th, 2005, 09:39 AM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What Changes in the CD Version
some news about patch?
|
September 5th, 2005, 12:01 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,261
Thanks: 3,814
Thanked 5,423 Times in 2,694 Posts
|
|
Re: What Changes in the CD Version
1-2 weeks. It just went to the playtesters for a final look over.
Don
__________________
If you find you are constantly reacting to your enemy's tactics instead forcing the enemy to react to yours, you are losing the battle....
|
September 5th, 2005, 03:52 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What Changes in the CD Version
I'm glad to be the playtester  |
September 6th, 2005, 12:32 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 213
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What Changes in the CD Version
Looking forward to the patch Don....You and Andy have been doing a fantastic job working on the patch and keeping up with things on the forum....My hats off to you both. Your work is greatly appreciated by all of us SP gamers out there
Tom D
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
