.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Salvo! - Save $5.00
World Supremacy - Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPWW2 > After Action Reports
Notices


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old October 22nd, 2017, 06:16 PM

Ravindau Ravindau is offline
Private
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 37
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Ravindau is on a distinguished road
Post Re: The Curse of the Delay

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG View Post
...the narrow criteria to "prove how unbalanced delays are"...
It needs a very good game, after all, to make criticism of a specific detail worthwhile.

I would just love the play balance of SPWW2 to be as good as the enormous content, playability, graphics,... already are.

Btw, in your game you would have had it much easier with the Russians, actually proving my point.

For balance testing, you really need to set up the AI against itself. Or equal players against each other.
  #32  
Old October 22nd, 2017, 08:15 PM

grond69 grond69 is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 8 Posts
grond69 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The Curse of the Delay

I don't usually weigh in on these discussions, but in this case I will make an exception. I think its time to face facts: your initial premise that delay/advance was seriously advantaged to advance, based on your one game, is incorrect. Both of the previous posters played similar sized battles from the delay side and crushed the advancing AI. I just finished one as well with same results: 16 casualties for me, decisive victory 3064:16. Fact is that the delay/advance isn't significantly one sided. The battle you set up was (unintentionally?) one sided. An experienced player would have seen the unit density, dimensions, and time allowed and concluded that the advance would have a decisive victory. The only question was how light your casualties would be. Why you might ask? Because the AI will always attempt to defend all objectives. That means that your high density attack force would only face 1/3 of the defenders. And, given the terrain, likely face single squads at a time. Pretty much what happened, right? The high number of turns was just icing.

Your idea of fighting many battles of equal human to human (and how do you measure that?) has basically been done in the past. This game has been around for YEARS! And you are right in that it is the best tactical game around. But don't expect the AI to give you a challenging game every time. It can't do that. If you find it too easy and don't want to mess around with settings, seek human adversaries on the "players wanted" section. I've played this game since the very first version came out, and expect to continue. I usually play long campaigns (hundreds of battles) and admit that I enjoy stomping all over the AI. Small of me, I know. Although, every once in a while, the AI still surprises me and I get a tough fight!

Don and Andy have made huge advances in improving this game and I believe that this will continue. Its up to us as the players to look at a random setup and be able to decide if it is fair to the AI. If we are looking for a fair fight....
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to grond69 For This Useful Post:
  #33  
Old October 22nd, 2017, 10:40 PM

jivemi jivemi is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 349
Thanks: 215
Thanked 75 Times in 63 Posts
jivemi is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The Curse of the Delay

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravindau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by jivemi View Post
Yeah, since his original theory is that SPWW2 is more like WWI,...
This is certainly not my opinion. When would I ever say such nonsense?
In last year's (closed) thread--http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=51209--in post #8 you said: "My Golden Rule of SPWW2 strategy: Buy lots and lots of rifles. Win the riflemen shootout. Make sure your opponent runs out of rifle squads first!"

And in post #18 you said, "Defending against tanks is easy, they die like flies. It´s defending against an infantry horde with artillery support which is near impossible. In other words, WWI generals were right, after all."

Sorry if I took your remarks out of context.

Last edited by jivemi; October 22nd, 2017 at 11:19 PM..
  #34  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 11:51 AM

Ravindau Ravindau is offline
Private
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 37
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Ravindau is on a distinguished road
Arrow Re: The Curse of the Delay

Quote:
Originally Posted by jivemi View Post

Sorry if I took your remarks out of context.
Not only that; you also got them upside down. My presupposition was that WWI generals were, of course, wrong. Their optimistic and superstitious belief in "the spirit of the offensive" only caused immense casualties without profit.

Their ideas didn´t work in WWI, nor would they have worked in WW2, and this is what I am saying all the time. SPWW2 has a bit of a leaning towards too optimistic outcomes (from the attack viewpoint), and that happens to be my pet issue for both gameplay and realism reasons.
  #35  
Old October 23rd, 2017, 03:17 PM
DRG's Avatar

DRG DRG is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 8,706
Thanks: 1,338
Thanked 1,986 Times in 1,044 Posts
DRG is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The Curse of the Delay

It's YOUR problem to deal with. You have been shown how. The game will not change
__________________
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2017, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.