.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Bronze- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 3: The Awakening

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 1st, 2008, 12:52 PM

Renojustin Renojustin is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 605
Thanks: 11
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Renojustin is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Domes are currently not working as intended, if I've read the shortlist correctly.
__________________
Sauromatia: Lawful Evil
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old May 1st, 2008, 12:56 PM

Zeldor Zeldor is offline
General
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
Zeldor is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Domes of the same type stack.

End-game though is really broken in dominions. It would probably need a huge rework as a whole. With many spells, summons and mechanics.
__________________
谋事在人,成事在天。

LA Agartha guide
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old May 1st, 2008, 01:01 PM

IndyPendant IndyPendant is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
IndyPendant is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Heh. I was the attacker in question, and I'm still rather annoyed about the whole thing. (Not at Twan, note. At this particular mechanic.) I basically wasted untold hours of complicated end-game turns, because evicting Twan was so incredibly, unbelievably unlikely that I might as well have gone AI shortly after he took the island. Even destroying the rest of his territories would have taken so long that by the time I was done he would have had his nigh-impenetrable defenses up on the central island...

It all came down to the defender casting first.

To answer some of the points brought up: spells cannot get past domes. Assassins and disease-spreaders cannot get past patrollers. Multiple attackers do not work against a castle. There was essentially no reasonable method, at all, of evicting him. Period.
__________________
MP Guide to MA Ermor
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old May 1st, 2008, 01:12 PM

VedalkenBear VedalkenBear is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 465
Thanks: 10
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
VedalkenBear is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Mm. I'm curious about several points, the primary of which is why the defender should have an advantage in battles. From a military perpective, the defender is generally seen to have a tactical advantage but an operational disadvantage. My concern is to how well this RL 'norm' translates into Dominions. If it is indeed true that the operational-level advantage normally held by the attacker is the case with Dominions, then retaining the defender tactical advantage sounds reasonable.

However, if the operational-level advantage is not realized, then I think that the defender's advantage should be mitigated. Note that I do not refer here to a specific situation (like the above points to). I refer to more general issues with the game.

One way to 'fix' this would be to implement an initiative system. Each 'unit' (commander or block of soldiers) gets a move. How hard would this be to implement?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old May 1st, 2008, 01:13 PM

Renojustin Renojustin is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 605
Thanks: 11
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Renojustin is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Domes are not working as intended, because they're not supposed to make an impenetrable wall of magic defense. They're not supposed to stack.
__________________
Sauromatia: Lawful Evil
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old May 1st, 2008, 01:24 PM
Twan's Avatar

Twan Twan is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Twan is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Domes of different types are supposed to stack, the bug was being able to stack several domes of the same kind (what I've not done in this game, but my province was anyway protected by up to 4 different domes).
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old May 1st, 2008, 01:44 PM

Ironhawk Ironhawk is offline
General
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
Ironhawk is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

4 domes is not effective cover in the endgame tho, when your opponent can amass an array of gem-poor spells to toss at them until they fail. If its really true that domes of the same type can stack tho, thats a pretty huge bug. You should *definitely* not be able to do that - its way too big of an advantage.

As for the defenders advantage - I dont see it as a problem. I mean you guys are listing a way, way endgame case for the failure of a mechanic. But the truth is that it works fine for the other 90% of the game. I think that if the dome issue were resolved that the defender issue would cease to be a problem since you could pound any stationary force to dust with artillery and assassination spells.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old May 1st, 2008, 01:45 PM

Zeldor Zeldor is offline
General
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
Zeldor is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Voice of Apsu as dome breaker is bug too.
__________________
谋事在人,成事在天。

LA Agartha guide
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old May 1st, 2008, 02:33 PM

Micah Micah is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 12
Thanked 86 Times in 48 Posts
Micah is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Huh, I love me some rain of stones, and it's one of the few ways to keep astral magic on the battlefield from being even more absurd in the late game (Astral mages tend to be fairly squishy...astrologers and the like). Having 30 mages spamming soul slay and enslave mind with a light of the northern star up is pretty absurd to have to deal with if they're all lucky, misted and army of whatever'd, especially if you don't have any national astral (magic duel anyone?). I really really really like that the attacker has to be careful with their squishies.

As has been previously pointed out in this thread, if you're assaulting someone at their strongest point you're DOING SOMETHING WRONG. Force them to come out of their hole. If you're playing a VP game recognize that sometimes the game is effectively over before the last VP is capped. If you're running a race and someone's 5 feet from the goal and you're a mile back you don't get to complain that it's nearly impossible to catch him, even though the race isn't technically over yet.

I love elegant solutions to problems though, and I'm not really one for the "stack my army til it's bigger than his army and let them pound each other" school of thought. I'd much prefer to lure in an enemy, decimate their mages and then have my way with their ground forces. That's strategy, not just having a bigger stick. This might be why I hate games once they get past the phase of having all the research done...armies get too big and the solution devolves into having one that's even bigger. Not my style.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old May 1st, 2008, 02:42 PM
Twan's Avatar

Twan Twan is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Twan is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Quote:
As for the defenders advantage - I dont see it as a problem. I mean you guys are listing a way, way endgame case for the failure of a mechanic.
I list a problematic category of spells. My view is battlefield instant offensive spells are only good for the game if the opponent can eventually counter them (be him attacker or not), and it's illogical that he can't use the counters if his mages have access to them (if my mages can cast army of gold, I see no reason for them to wait to cast it... after all ennemy rain of stones).

The problem is "endgame" mostly because most of these spells and counters are rather high level, but the rare cases where a nation can pull a round one casting destructive script in midgame (ie : chained earthquakes to kill your mages with body ethearal to protect his own) are as problematic IMO.

ps : I'm not saying mages shouldn't be able to destroy entire armies. Simply if the opponent know what you will use and have mages able to cast the counter spells, a good script should allow him to survive, and it's not the case actually.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.