.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Bronze- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 3: The Awakening

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old May 1st, 2008, 03:02 PM

Aezeal Aezeal is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,691
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 31 Posts
Aezeal is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

This might be why I hate games once they get past the phase of having all the research done...armies get too big and the solution devolves into having one that's even bigger. Not my style.

--> this is like totally not so.. end game small forces can kill big armies and it's about how you use what you have.
__________________
Want a blend of fantasy and sci-fi? Try the total conversion Dominions 3000 mod with a new and fully modded solar system map.
Dragons wanted? Try the Dragons, Magic Incarnate nation.
New and different undead nation? Try Souls of Shiar. Including new powerfull holy magic.
In for a whole new sort of game? Then try my scenario map Gang Wars.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old May 1st, 2008, 04:05 PM
Meglobob's Avatar

Meglobob Meglobob is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
Meglobob is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Twan, the problem in your particular game was not the dominions endgame but the victory conditions of your MP game.

It was essentially, owning 1 VP for so many turns I believe. So once a nation was strong enough to get it, castle it then it was effectively game over. As the defending player could put everything he had into defending it for the limited number of turns you had to defend it.

Culmative VP's are not a good idea, I speak from previous experience.

Multiple VP's would have stretched your forces more thinly and given the attacker/s more chance.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old May 1st, 2008, 04:32 PM
Twan's Avatar

Twan Twan is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Twan is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Putting everything has nothing to do with it.

To cast master Enslave (without losing communion slaves) you need 6 mages (one casting LoNS, 4 slaves, master with S5 and matrix).
To cast Undead Mastery you need the D7 guy summoning your tartarians.
You need one more S mage for antimagic.
To cast Rain of Stones you need one rare indie mage (adept of metal order) or one tartarian titan with their most common paths, or any E3 mage empowered A1.
To cast something protecting your mages against rain of stones you need one E4 (army of...) or one A4 mage (fog warriors).
To block ennemies in castle gates you need 20 or so heavy infantry or living statues, and a storm to make fliers useless (staff on one commander or cast by a mage).

Total : the fight would have been exactly similar with just the 10-12 mages with the needed paths + say 30 hoplites. It's far to be "putting everything" a nation has in endgame (the only difficulty is gathering mages with the good paths). I remember games where I could have defended half my forts with that at the same time.

My additionnal mages have only dammaged my own troops (one casting wrathfull skies on my non-shock resistant army), and my SCs never reached the ennemies.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old May 1st, 2008, 05:55 PM

Valerius Valerius is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 83
Thanked 215 Times in 77 Posts
Valerius is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Micah already said most of what I wanted to say but I'll add that I don't think the counter to these spells is to give attacking armies a free pass (a chance to buff before the defender's spells take effect) but to use a different force to attack (in fact, I'd say these spells are the counter to large armies/squads of mages and are working as intended). The decision of whether to attack and with what forces is just as much a part of the strategy as unit placement and scripting. Just as a solo SC may be met with an SC-killing squad so might an army be met with these spells. I don't see any reason why they should be guaranteed a chance to buff. It's like saying you have one tool and you want apply it to all situations as opposed to using something better suited to the job.

It is also worth noting that the changes you propose would have different effects on the direct damage spells vs. the MR resist spells. I think army of gold will reduce the effectiveness of rain of stones or earthquake to a greater degree than antimagic will the death/astral spells, especially since you can increase your penetration through boosters or adding mages to the communion. As Micah noted the net result might be to make astral nations even more powerful.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old May 1st, 2008, 07:21 PM

Agema Agema is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 792
Thanks: 28
Thanked 45 Times in 31 Posts
Agema is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Instead of butting your head against a strongpoint, outmanoeuver them. If someone sits on a province and defends it, then take other provinces. They can hardly flourish without gems, income, and so on.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old May 1st, 2008, 07:42 PM

Ironhawk Ironhawk is offline
General
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
Ironhawk is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Yeah I concur with Micah and Valerius. The defender does get the advantage by attacking first but this by no means makes them invincible - you just have to use a different army configuration.

Agema: in the listed example, outmanuerving was not an option since the fort was protecting a key VP.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old May 1st, 2008, 07:45 PM

K K is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 773
Thanks: 2
Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
K is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

I think some people get really offended that the late game is dependent on magic, and I can't really sympathize.

If Rain of Stones kills your human mages, then you should have armored them.

If your armies get taken by Master Enslave, then you should have sent in high MR troops like thugs or SCs.

Basically, the endgame is a wild place. Mere force of arms is a losing tactic.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old May 1st, 2008, 08:56 PM
Twan's Avatar

Twan Twan is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Twan is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Strawman.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 12:14 AM

K K is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 773
Thanks: 2
Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
K is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

Quote:
Twan said:
Strawman.
It's only a strawman argument if I mischaracterized your position in order to make it easier to attack.

I've critiqued the core of your position, which is not the same.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 02:24 AM

kasnavada kasnavada is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 579
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
kasnavada is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Casting first in defence + endgame spells

K... See post #602646. What you've said has already been suggested, and the answer already is here. You're 1 page late.
__________________
Often I must speak other than I think. That is called diplomacy.
* Stilgar
Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you a cover up. Real boats rock.
* Darwi Odrade
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.