![]() |
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Quote:
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Heres my windows client line on WinXP for the game I saw this is in.....
"C:\Program Files\dominions2\dom2.exe" -mwaifx --tcpclient --ipadr 209.157.135.121 --port 10000 As far as I know the host is running on windows also. What happened was almost a game turner. Im playing Man and had a sneaking unequiped monk watching troop movements. The message said he had been discovered and attacked. I watched the battle and was relieved to see that the local defense took him out in one hit. But when I looked at the map I owned the province and he was still in it. OOPS. I wasnt trying to go to war with that player. Now I owned a province in the middle of his area and right next to a castle. Multi-tasking WinXP a problem? Ive heard it blamed for things in other games. [ January 08, 2004, 14:12: Message edited by: Gandalf Parker ] |
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Well I'm knocking on wood, but so far my battle replays show exactly what happened.
Since I didn't know you had to create the pretender before logging on, it's understandable that I ended up not having a password since I don't use passwords in SP. This is really a learning experience for me. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif I am looking forward to figuring out how the whole MP thing works. Gandalf...don't tell me if you don't want to since I'm in this game...but how are you acting now that you have this territory right next to the other guy's castle? (And it probably isn't me but I don't know.) Are you sending a message apologizing and telling him he can have the territory back? Putting defense there? Sneaking your monk away so that it will be free of hostile units for recapture? Raising taxes to 200%? I don't know about the other players, but these considerations would apply for me with respect to whether this were viewed as an act of war. I also don't know about MP etiquette with regard to sending Messages to players. If folks are annoyed by getting what they regard as "too many" Messages from me, please let me know. Maybe the reason my replays are consistent (so far) is that I'm using XP also. |
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Gandalf is playing Pangaea in this game, not Man.
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
I'm Man, not Gandalf. Gandalf wouldn't have lost his pretender in the first turn. *bleh*
Stupid barbarian ambushes... http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif So, I've been less hurt than others by two stale turns, I suppose. Well, at least I have an excuse... |
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Karacan, you seem to be doing pretty well in terms of total territory for someone who has had two stale turns and no longer has a pretender. Hats off to you.
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Quote:
[ January 08, 2004, 16:13: Message edited by: Teraswaerto ] |
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
In this game Im Man. In the game I quoted Im Pangaea. I just wanted to toss my example out for Kristoffer to look at.
As to how I handled it, I apologized and told the guy to feel free to take it back without it being thought of as an act of war. But dont take me as an example. If anything, I will tend to be an example of doing things that no one else does http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif -- If you cant beat 'em, then join 'em. If you cant beat em or join em, then at least try to surprise them. [ January 08, 2004, 16:11: Message edited by: Gandalf Parker ] |
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Quote:
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
I think most folks don't yet have two involuntary stale turns. Please correct me if this is incorrect.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.