![]() |
Re: Defending vs. stronger neighbor early attacks
Quote:
|
Re: Defending vs. stronger neighbor early attacks
Quote:
You were Pangea, I believe. I should not have attacked in that situation, true, but I do not remember too much else about that game. This post is actually prompted by other games I have been in since then, where I have run into stronger neighbors such as Jotunheim when I was Marignon or Abysia. I kept the peace, but I was not sure why my neighbors would not want to attack my weaker troops with their giants. An inferior number of giants has no problem taking out twice as many man-sized troops, it seems to me. Other than diplomatic reasons, I am not sure why the "giant player" would refrain from taking out another player early on if they happen to be neighbors. |
Re: Defending vs. stronger neighbor early attacks
Not to throw fuel on that fire but many still consider taking the capital province, and taking the other guys castle, to be the same decision. Definetly try to think of those as seperate things. There are many MANY seperate advantages to taking a nations home province even if you dont plan to keep it and dont plan to storm the castle.
Personally I prefer to try and ally with my first or second neighbor. It gives me a clear "back and front" for expansion. [ March 27, 2004, 18:41: Message edited by: Gandalf Parker ] |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.