![]() |
Re: Vampire Queens and Sneaking Armies
Quote:
In both cases if I originally sneak, then re-click to change I get choices of: defend province, patrol province (which patrols current in both cases), move, search, preach, blood hunt, construct, pillage, cancel. If I originally ctrl-click to move instead of sneak, I get the exact same choices except move is replaced by sneak in the list. It seems there's something missing as I can think of no logical reason why they wouldn't be able to move&patrol like every regular army. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">For any unit to move and patrol you have to be going into a castle. You are aware of that, right? |
Re: Vampire Queens and Sneaking Armies
If you want to restrict access to her, Black Forest Ulm strikes me as the most thematically reasonable beneficiary.
|
Re: Vampire Queens and Sneaking Armies
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Vampire Queens and Sneaking Armies
Bah, vq's suck. Mine got decked (along with about 200 ulmish infantry) 4 times in a row by a group of 5 random invading heroes, including a troll on his own at the end, vs 120 black plate elites, 5-6 smiths and the vq pumped up with equipment each time (although no spells, to support an ulm-friendly dominion).
Normally though, she's vulnerable to all sorts of spells and enchanted items... |
Re: Vampire Queens and Sneaking Armies
Quote:
|
Re: Vampire Queens and Sneaking Armies
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Vampire Queens and Sneaking Armies
Quote:
a fire 4 shield? well, sure, if you're not even trying. W/ Alt 3 Enchant 1 a cheap VQ can destroy pretty well anything on the planet w/out breaking a sweat. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Basically, you are just saying that Etherealness, Regeneration, High Protection (armor or ironskin/invulnerability), Low Encumberance, Life Drain, and Immortality... are really uber together. Well, that's a suprise! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif However, that can be acomplished by a number of pretender templates... either through magic or items (though the immortality + full items slots is hard to beat). She's the fastest out of the gate whooping it up with Indie 9s really early... but I don't think this is a problem, because somebody has to be... why not the VQ? However, I think the full item slots means that she doesn't suffer at all for this in the late game... pretenders like the Dragons, Bulls, Wyrm, ect... can whoop up on indies early too, but they are more limited in the later game(ie against other empires), because they can't increase their power as effectively with added items... So take away her misc slots. See how popular she is. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif |
Re: Vampire Queens and Sneaking Armies
The infamous Bogus the Troll Raider is substantially nastier than most non-unique independents (Bloodhenge Druids could perhaps be nasty if they get lucky with Bleed, say). The combination of good prot, high base hp, good combat stats, a wraith sword and good regeneration is harsh if you merely melee him with living troops.
Hm. Should vampires be ethereal? I'm not sure what source that would be based on, and it's a substantial boost against indies conveniently lacking magic weapons. Take that away, perhaps give them a 'change shape' order (wolf? bat?) if one must, *shrug*. |
Re: Vampire Queens and Sneaking Armies
Quote:
|
Re: Vampire Queens and Sneaking Armies
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.