![]()  | 
	
		
 Maintenace Value 
		
		
		So is there a bug in the Maintence value for your racial trait??  I just experimented with this and the results you get are clearly not in line with the values you select.  ie you would think that if you choose 110% for maintenance you would be 10% better that a race with the default 100%.  But this is not the case!!!  Could be why I'm getting my but kicked in a PBW game.   http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif 
	 | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		It isn't a bug, so much as an oversight. That trait lowers the base maintenance, not the maintenance paid. 
	You can fix it in mods though. Make the base maint. paid be 100%. Give all ship sizes 75% maintenance reduction, and bases 96% (IIRC). Then, 1 point in Maint Redux actually lowers maintenance paid by 1%. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif Of course, then you need to raise max level of Maint Redux and lower its cost and raise the threshhold level, as 10% becomes worth less than 500 points. Look at the Pirates and Nomads mod for an example of a mod that fixes the Maint Redux trait.  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		Right now, you get better performance than what the numbers indicate. A 10% increase in your maintenance trait lowers your base rate from 25% to 15%--a 40% improvement. Some mods, including PvK's Balance Mod and SJ's Pirates and Nomads Mod, seek to address this issue. 
	 | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		Krsqk, the numbers tell you how much it will lower base maintenance. They lower it by exacty what they indicate.  http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif 
	 | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		To-may-to or to-mah-to?  http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif  
	If you're thinking it lowers it from 25% to 15%, you're right. If you're thinking it lowers your maintenance total by 10%, you're getting a better deal than you think.  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		I think that it does say it lowers base maintenance costs somewhere official.  http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif 
	 | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		To quote my wife... 
	"...half of one, six dozen of another, it makes no difference..." Slick.  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		Quote: 
	
 six dozen of another = 72 You are telling me that .5 and 72 are the same? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/shock.gif I think the correct cliche is "...half dozen of one, six of another, it makes no difference..." http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon6.gif But anyways, the difference between lowering maintenance paid and base maintenance cost is enormous! Assume the maintenance is 1000. Lower maintenance paid by 10%, you get 900. Lower base maintenance paid by 10%, you get: 1000 / 0.25 = 4000 (cost of ship) 4000 * 0.15 = 600 That subtle difference of wording makes quite a big difference! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		[quote]Originally posted by DirectorTsaarx: 
	Quote: 
	
 As others have not pointed out the math is like so: 100% value = 25% maintenance 110% value = 15% maintenance I gather there may be something in the manual somewhere that says this is the way it is but certainly there is nothing to suggest this on the race setup screeen  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		Quote: 
	
 I think Slick was submiting an entry to the "hillareous things our women say" thread. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		[quote]Originally posted by DavidG: 
	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by DirectorTsaarx: Quote: 
	
 As others have not pointed out the math is like so: 100% value = 25% maintenance 110% value = 15% maintenance I gather there may be something in the manual somewhere that says this is the way it is but certainly there is nothing to suggest this on the race setup screeen</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">In addition to maintenance, happines,reproduction and tolerance are not what one would think of. [ January 15, 2003, 12:04: Message edited by: oleg ]  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		Quote: 
	
 six dozen of another = 72 You are telling me that .5 and 72 are the same? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/shock.gif I think the correct cliche is "...half dozen of one, six of another, it makes no difference..." http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon6.gif But anyways, the difference between lowering maintenance paid and base maintenance cost is enormous! Assume the maintenance is 1000. Lower maintenance paid by 10%, you get 900. Lower base maintenance paid by 10%, you get: 1000 / 0.25 = 4000 (cost of ship) 4000 * 0.15 = 600 That subtle difference of wording makes quite a big difference! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I guess the humor was totally lost on you. Ok. Let me explain. The thread was talking about how the maintenance reduction worked. Some people thought it was a flat reduction in total maintanence, but it is really a lowering of the base rate which makes it significantly more effective. Yes, I understand that "half of 1 and six dozen of another" are different. Yes, I understand the correct cliche. Yes, that was a direct quote from my wife and I thought it was funny at the time since she was serious. Yes, I thought it was funny and applicable to this thread because the two understandings are NOT the same and it DOES make a difference. Maybe not everyone caught the joke. Slick. [ January 15, 2003, 15:44: Message edited by: Slick ]  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		Quote: 
	
 I think Slick was submiting an entry to the "hillareous things our women say" thread. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif [/QB]</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's right and I got lots more. Here is another one: in reference to a luncheon that she was unhappy about what they were serving "They were only serving these tiny ham sandwiches. It just wasn't Kosher." I wrote down some of the better ones, but I don't have the notebook with me right now. Slick.  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Re: Maintenace Value 
		
		
		Must not have been that good of a joke then.  http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif 
	 | 
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 PM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.