If what they reject is western culture I don’t see why they have to deny western wealth. Currency is backed by the wealth, not by the culture.
It depends on your definition of ‘stable’ and ‘unstable’.
I don’t know if this is what Some1 meant with “technically NOT STABLE”, but there’ve been many more successful coups against democracies than against dictatorships.
To overcome a dictatorship you need to support a rebel force able to face the dictator’s military.
To overcome a democracy you just need to turn the military leaders against the civilian government.
Quote:
|
Oh yes, but also MUST be a Democracy friendly to Occident, specially friendly to USA.
|
And more important, will the western world and specially the USA support a democracy even if it chooses to act against its economic interests?
Will an Iraqi democracy be allowed for example to take measures that may affect the oil market?
Iraq may be labeled a democracy soon, after all that is needed as a justification for this conflict. But yes it will take some time until it matures into “independent country with a true Democracy”.
This also depends on how strict are your definitions of ‘independence’ and ‘true democracy’ but I believe and hope that you'll live long enough to see this happen.