Quote:
narf poit chez BOOM said:
What, exactly, are they *claiming?
* Calling it fiction sounds like a convenient excuse so they don't have to defend their claims, to me.
|
That's the point here: What
EXACTLY have you
ACTUALLY heard publically, from either Dan Brown or Ron Howard ???
There's a ton of controversy, speculation, and commentary out there right now, but little if any word from the specific sources of it all. And the book
WAS published as a
work of fiction 
Dan Brown based that fiction on ideas both popular and unpopular, true enough. The part that sends me rolling to the floor is how
EVERYBODY is making such a big deal over a novel that
NEVER stated, absolutely & definitively, that it was a work of historical, social, or scientific fact.
