| 
				 Re: OT: but Mr. Architect, why can't you make a perfect world? 
 @Squirrelloid
 I disagree about that. I like people and things that are not perfect.
 The good parts/traits/days are worth the bad ones => I like it.
 Perfect => bad parts don't exists and there are no parts missing.
 This should be definition enough.
 
 
 edit: Haha, Omniziron you have a very different definition of perfect (which is circular by the way ... but your pic is too so maybe that's intended?)
 But I have to add No part is in the wrong place (time, relation, whatever).
 
                 Last edited by Illuminated One; October 19th, 2009 at 09:47 PM..
 |