Guys for now and
BE CAREFUL HOW YOU READ THESE PLEASE I take from the best I have on these tanks again for now. I have tires to get for my car and the daughter and family just left to go back to Virginia which leaves me with an emotional CINCLANTHOME right now.
I ask your patience but in the meantime I provide some light reading all of which I spent a couple of hours into the early morning already reading myself and still "
digesting".
http://id3486.securedata.net/fprado/armorsite/T-90S.htm
http://fofanov.armor.kiev.ua/
Very technical data he gives real numbers.
Both the
T-72BU and
T-80U gave "
birth" to the
T-90 so next is the best I found when considering the "
depth" of the issue so far.
http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/mo...a/T-90_MBT.php
The next is falling into line with the rest, but understand, I just now gave this a "
quick read" please take this into account.
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/t90.htm
(Don you will note in here concerning INDIA (SURPRISE/SURPRISE!! 
they use both names. I also believe I brought this up for the last Patch submissions for all the Indian tank adjustments I submitted. Refer to my last post in the Jet Thread for the specific Posts.)
What I see now is...
1.
Possibly STEEL (
T-90) probably is the same as the
T-72BU which at the time appears to have been the "
pinnacle" of T-72 development when they moved onto the
T-90.
2.
T-90 did have thermal NV sites that falls somewhere between
800M to 1000M effective range.
3. Does the game
T-90 reflect the
KONTACT-5 values we use for that particular ERA? If not we have an issue there quite obviously.
I gotta get myself together and get going!!!!!
Regards,
Pat
