Re: Towns seems ineffective when you have Palaces available
I don't know - a lot of times I have to go with towns - I simply don't have the cash or will need it shortly. I figure towns are good at the start when you are just trying to plug up the map. Since your forward field is supsceptable to ziggaruts anyway, there isn't much different.
I guess I'm thinking this way becuase of that time I raced to a river with another group, threw down a palace and then couldn't afford the darn bridge. So there I am casting around for silver and the guy is across and away.
Yeah, its nice if you are in a jammed up against someone, but otherwise towns will do.
If a palace was 6, I'm not sure anyone would use them.
|