Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrelloid
So why is this necessarily a niche game?
|
Why is it niche?
- Turn based strategy is niche. Very hard to get a AAA publisher for. (Yeah, I know it is a circle definition, it is niche because the big boys say it is niche). There are very few exceptions, civilization, and some handheld tbs games. And only civ has some depth.
- It has a humongous learning curve. As almost all tbs games have. This makes it hard to pick up and play. Which makes it niche.
- Comparing it to Civ isn't totally fair. Civ is the exception to the rule. You should compare it to other AAA tbs games. Ow wait... these don't really exist... why would that be?
- Would the 14 year old the current halo/gears of war crowd play Dom3? Or women? Would your mom play it? For most of these it would be No. So that makes it kinda niche.
Nobody said that fantasy made it a niche game. I think it is the other way around.
And Warhammer and Avalon hill games are also niche. They appeal to a very specific set of people. And this group isn't that large you know.
Just compare tbs games with depth to adventure games. Both have great potential. But remain niche.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrelloid
If dom3 got half the advertising Civ IV had gotten ...
|
And if the GUI had been fixed, the graphics polished, the micro fixed, the AI better, A single player campaign included etc...
13lackGu4rd, if a AAA publisher would have developed the game they would have thrown a lot of the depth of the game out of it. They are looking to reach a max amount of players. (So the game is less 'nichey'). So sure, it wouldn't be a niche game if it was developed by Blizzard for example. But it also wouldn't be Dom3.
But I agree, it is niche because it has a niche developer. But that is what makes Dom3, Dom3.
Edit: Just fyi, but I think hardcore gamers have become a niche.