Thread: Scenario 476
View Single Post
  #5  
Old June 14th, 2020, 09:57 AM
DRG's Avatar

DRG DRG is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,268
Thanks: 3,816
Thanked 5,438 Times in 2,698 Posts
DRG will become famous soon enough
Exclamation Re: Scenario 476

I *think* I have this figured out.

I checked the TXT file of that scenario from a copy of the game I have from 2017 and it reads.......

Quote:
Chabrehez*
*
Date: May 10, 1940*
*
Battle Location: Chabrehez, Ardennes region, Belgium*
*
Battle Type: Belgium defend vs Germany assault*
My master game does not show that. I checked the "virgin" copy of the game I keep to test patch installs. That one is the same as everyone's game that was patched to V13 and still has the old pre 2020 scenario format files in the scenarios folder. I left them in my test game deliberately for reasons just like this and it says the same thing BUT ONLY IN THE OLD FORMAT.... the V13 copy of the game using the new scenario format shows

Quote:

Sicily: Ponte Dirillo, 1400hrs*
*
*
Date: 10th July 1943*
*
Location: Ponte Dirillo, near Gela, southern Sicily, Italy*
*
Type: US vs. German meeting engagement*
The corrected text file is in V13 so the game he is playing is not V13 and he needs to install the latest patch.


.......FURTHER

Did some digging and in V13 scenario 0479 is Chabrehez 5/40... BUT it still reports being 476. I did some re-arranging when the new format was introduced to group the 4 Sicily scenarios together and that numbering change was missed ......BUT in V13 all the scenarios are corrected so we are back to he needs to install the latest patch and everything will be as it should be aside from scenario 0479 reporting 476 which is trivial
__________________


If you find you are constantly reacting to your enemy's tactics instead forcing the enemy to react to yours, you are losing the battle....

Last edited by DRG; June 14th, 2020 at 10:12 AM..
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post: