Did you skip 34 or was it OK
Will investigate but..
1/ I'm going to say that may be deliberate to stop players from using them more than once.
2/........ no early on there was more "creativity" from scenario designers poking around with little unit changes to customize things and that has tapered off over the years...thankfully..... it makes error checking much easier when the units haven't been changed but 13 carry DOES appear to be a scenario designer adjustment as the 251/10 has only had a 3 man carry capacity since the DOS days and changing that creates problems I'm just going to leave alone.
Carry capacity is fixed in the game but it is
FAR more flexible in RL
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/15/4a...a61b5505c5.jpg
https://www.nps.gov/museum/exhibits/...-8-14-1944.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/c8/b2...89b15f79ad.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/c1/25...cc6c25b72f.jpg
3/ in the future, knowing which unit number is VERY HELPFUL.
When that scenario was built they were carrying K98's now that unit carries 7.92k Mkb 42(H) and their in and out of service dates are completely different which is why that photo is what it is and why the units still carry the old weapons. That's the way the game preserves the major data the Scenario designer was working with at the time it was built but unit photo is not critical data that could alter a scenario