Armadillo - started

[llamabeast]

I guess we should choose a map, and a number of players.

How about 'Glory of the Gods (multiplayer)' - 227 lands, 47 seas. I haven't played on it myself, so opinions are welcome.

If we go for that map, I'd suggest 12 land nations and 2 sea nations. Again, anyone have any thoughts?

Oh, and let's say it will be an MA game, since that seems to be the consensus.

Kristoffer - do you realise you've listed the 4 nations generally considered (as far as I've heard) to be the weakest in MA?

[llamabeast]

For the hosting schedule - I would suggest going with 24 hours up until turn 40 or 50, then switching to 48 hours. But, since I won't be playing, we should again go with the popular vote - what would people prefer?

[Sir_Dr_D]

I would like a game that has all middle age nations, if that is possible

[Meglobob]

llamabeast said:
For the hosting schedule - I would suggest going with 24 hours up until turn 40 or 50, then switching to 48 hours. But, since I won't be playing, we should again go with the popular vote - what would people prefer?

I vote 24hr 1-20, then 48hr 21+

Sir_Dr_D said:
I would like a game that has all middle age nations, if that is possible

It is all MA nations. See 1st post.

[Dedas]

I can agree to that.

[Teraswaerto]

I would like to play.

MA - Pythium

[Sieger]

Since Teras wants Pythium I'll take Ermor.

[llamabeast]

It is all MA nations. See 1st post.

Well, yes in the sense that all of the nations are MA. But not necessarily in the sense that all of the MA nations will be in the game. I'm after your opinions as to how many players should be in the game.

Obviously more players leads to a more epic feel, but also to a much longer game with a bigger lategame.

[Arghaii]

I will play Abysia, if there is space.

[Hadrian_II]

i'd like to join as Rlyeh