Artifacts Forgery (starting soon)

[Zeldor]

Exactly. And that's what sticks in online community, especially small one. I still cannot understand why he'd sent a 3-turn notice and attack after 1 turn. Changes almost nothing in that game, but spoil his diplomacy in all future games.

[WingedDog]

Zeldor
There are many people who do not care much for player's reputation.

[Zeldor]

I could use 24h more for that turn. And maybe we should switch to 72h?

[WingedDog]

More 24 hours? You mean until Thursday?

[Zeldor]

Oh, I was sure it is hosting tomorrow morning. So no need for delay

[Juffos]

Hey Zeldor



I gave a fair declarement of cancelling the non-aggression pact to your predecessor, but you chose to mind hunt my people down. My Pretender has decided that to be a breach of the NAP and thus you the original betrayer.

You are leading in research and you have two gem-producing globals up and at least you led in provinces. You thought all other players would just stand idle while you are racing towards victory? You had this coming.

You also seem to consider having scouts in another player's lands as breaching a NAP. Aren't you a bit too strict here, mm?

Don't you think you're a bit overreacting to the situation, you are the leading player in the game, shouldn't you be able to remove treacherous pretenders without forum flames?

All this we both are going through is completely pointless.

[Zeldor]

Juffos:

You sent a NAP3 warning. You attacked after 1 turn. And the only possible situation when someone of yours could be mind hunted would be if he was in my lands [as I was aiming mind hunts at Jomon raiders]. So you are simply unhonourable person that breaks treaties. So yes, I will keep my word. I just hate people that break treaties for no reason. And yes, I will get so low to remind about your behaviour in every game you join.

You did a mistake, breached a NAP without any reason. You may say sorry, pay reparations, get few turns of peace and we fight fairly after that. Otherwise you know what awaits you. Your choice.

[fungalreason]

Wow, get a grip....

Arco is clearly dominating. They have most of the artifacts, elemental royalty, gem income, and resarch DOUBLE that of the next player. If you think a NAP at that point has any meaning, you're probably playing the wrong game. I don't know about you, but I expect anyone that builds up such a lead will have to defend it at some point, not NAP their way to a victory. It's not like Man had any other options since Arco completely boxed them in the corner, so I don't see why you're acting as if this attack is unexpected.

Regardless, threats about posting in other game threads is ridiculous. In fact I'd be less likely to deal with YOU rather than Juffo should you choose to pursue that route.

[Zeldor]

fungalreason:

I have nothing against him attacking me [after all, he has not many other choices and Arco is leading]. The only problem is that he said the he cancels NAP3 and attacked turn after. If he attacked straight, without saying anything, I'd be OK with that. If he waited 3 turns it would be fine too.

For me it looks like he had an intention to attack after 1 turn while sending 3-turn notice. Things like that are not really liked in that MP community.

P.S. I don't give Arco many chances to survive that war. Previous player did a great job at getting to that power, but then neglected diplomatic relations and made almost no preparations for coming wars.

[WingedDog]

I have postponed hosting for 8 hours.