|
|
|
|
November 6th, 2007, 04:54 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 477
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
In my experience playing a MP game with Bandar Log, the main points of pain for Bandar Log are:
1. Crappy forts. Mostly fortified cities. Sometimes you want these, mostly you want something cheap.
2. Crappy priests. Combined with the above, it blunts the recruitable-everywhere-sacred edge.
3. Crappy searching. Bandar Log is a real gem-hog, with its summons and gem-heavy battlemagic. But the Rishis only have map-move 1, and remote searching spells may accentuate your gem shortage if you're unlucky.
|
November 6th, 2007, 05:29 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Quote:
Sandman said:
In my experience playing a MP game with Bandar Log, the main points of pain for Bandar Log are:
2. Crappy priests. Combined with the above, it blunts the recruitable-everywhere-sacred edge.
|
I think this only slows down early expansion, as the 9hp unarmored priests just like to be shot with an arrow and rout everything. But later you can either recruit siddhas for your bigger armies or just recruit enough indy priests to bless your armies.
Quote:
Sandman said:3. Crappy searching. Bandar Log is a real gem-hog, with its summons and gem-heavy battlemagic. But the Rishis only have map-move 1, and remote searching spells may accentuate your gem shortage if you're unlucky.
|
Quote:
Sandman said:
This is a problem, especially with their lack of magic paths . But i would say that you get more gems for remote site searching than it costs, so it should not shorten your gem supply.
|
Quote:
Lord_Bob said:
Attempts to raid them with "200 gold force"
|
Why dont you just get your own 200 gold force out if indys instead of buying 20 PD for the same price, so you have at least a 50% chance in winning.
|
November 6th, 2007, 05:44 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Quote:
Why dont you just get your own 200 gold force out if indys instead of buying 20 PD for the same price, so you have at least a 50% chance in winning.
|
And then I put them in every province and pay maintenace every turn. And then they die to a slightly more powerfull force. PD, in order to be effective, has to be CHEAPER THAN THE RAIDING FORCE THAT CAN BEAT IT.
|
November 6th, 2007, 06:56 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 62
Thanks: 17
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Quote:
Hadrian_II said:this only slows down early expansion
|
Early expansion is one of the most important things in MP.
|
November 6th, 2007, 07:42 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Quote:
Yucky said:
Quote:
Hadrian_II said:this only slows down early expansion
|
Early expansion is one of the most important things in MP.
|
Bandar logs expansion is fast enough, you can start every second turn a force of approx 15 dual blessed white ones in the battle (an early temple does not hurt to get the mages). you might even try to start a conquering party every turn.
I did some short check and i was able to get 15 provinces in a year, and this is not that bad, especially as i did it in 5 minutes. The slowing down of expansion did happen as one of my expanding party (10 tigre riders and a brahmin) got defeated, as the brahmin said hy to an arrow.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|