Forum: TO&Es
June 17th, 2021, 11:18 PM
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 1,833
Re: Manpack flamethrowers
I see, there are several in a squad.
I had thought that because the FmW.46 and Lanciafiamme Mod 41 assalto's usefulness is extremely limited I assumed it would be issued not as a General purpose...
|
|
Forum: TO&Es
June 1st, 2021, 06:53 AM
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 1,833
Re: Manpack flamethrowers
sorry for that I posted this before I read your comments.
Obviously if you could give me an Idea of how the scenarios and OOBs interact then that would be very helpfull in discussing how the...
|
|
Forum: TO&Es
June 1st, 2021, 06:51 AM
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 1,833
Re: Manpack flamethrowers
According to Canfield US infantry weapons of WW2
The US had no flamethrowers during WW1 and had no interest between wars in flamethrowers. They began development of their first flamethrowers in...
|
|
Forum: TO&Es
May 28th, 2021, 06:49 AM
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 1,833
Manpack flamethrowers
I had a look at infantry flamethrowers and found a series of errors according to the literature. I've detailed these below, please note these are not MODs based on my Point Of View these are...
|
