| 
 | 
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
 
    
    
 
    
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
 
    
    
 
    
    
 | 
       | 
      
 
 
	
		  | 
	
	
 
 
		
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				March 30th, 2001, 02:38 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				Sergeant 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Jan 2001 
					Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 
					
					
						Posts: 215
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Balck Holes too soft
	
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		I am having discussions with my other players in the games that we are playing and it is about the fact that Black hloes only draw in at 2. 
I would like to see them do it at 6, thus making life very difficult for tech 1 type engines. 
 
Any thought?? 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				March 30th, 2001, 02:40 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				Corporal 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Mar 2001 
					
					
					
						Posts: 60
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Balck Holes too soft
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		 quote: Originally posted by Aussie Gamer: 
I am having discussions with my other players in the games that we are playing and it is about the fact that Black hloes only draw in at 2. 
I would like to see them do it at 6, thus making life very difficult for tech 1 type engines. 
 
Any thought??
  
actually, they should draw in more, the closer you are.  This would probably require a code change.  
  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				March 30th, 2001, 02:48 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				Captain 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Jan 2001 
					Location: Dallas, Texas 
					
					
						Posts: 817
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Balck Holes too soft
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		The AI can not even barely handle 2,  
But just for you, I have increased them to 6. 
Load this file into the data file, overwrite the SystemTypes 
 
The only thing I changed is the number of sectors a blackhole pulls a ship to the cneter per turn. 
Enjoy 
 
And remember, AI's will not be able to handle this. I think if you human control them for one turn, You can set up were they void blackhole systems. (this I have not tryed) 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				March 30th, 2001, 03:58 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
			
				
				
				 Shrapnel Fanatic 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Feb 2001 
					Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
					
					
						Posts: 11,451
					 
					 
	Thanks: 1 
	
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Balck Holes too soft
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		Actually, they should not pull ships in at all! 
 
Since even supergiant stars don't pull ships in, a black hole should not pull ships in. 
 
If the earth was crushed into a black hole for some mysterious reason,  all the satellites we have in orbit would stay in orbit for centuries. 
 
Once you're in orbit, you stay in orbit.  Since ships have stable positions in normal systems, they are clearly orbiting the star at the same rate as the planets. 
If the ships do this in a black hole system, then they will not fall in, even if they have no engines. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Things you want: 
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				March 30th, 2001, 04:44 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				Captain 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Jan 2001 
					Location: Dallas, Texas 
					
					
						Posts: 817
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Balck Holes too soft
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		I have pulled my statment until I recieve a response from Mr. hawkings 
 
[This message has been edited by Dracus (edited 30 March 2001).] 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				March 30th, 2001, 05:10 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				Corporal 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Feb 2001 
					Location: Maryland 
					
					
						Posts: 52
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 26 Times in 15 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Balck Holes too soft
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		Dracus bloviates: 
If you don't have a planet (IE earth crushed) then the sats would be pulled in, because 
then there would be no orbit. orbits are based on speed ver grav. That is why we have 
to push our sats back up, because in time, grav overpowers them. All the planets are 
slowly being pulled toward the sun. It will take billions of years but in time the earth 
will crash into our sun. Take a science math course or read a steven Hawken book. It 
is all explained there. 
 
Lord Felix, a member of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science, responds: 
Nope, that's all nonsense. Satellites would orbit an earth-mass blackhole EXACTLY the way they would orbit the Earth. In an idealized system including NOTHING but the Earth and the Moon in orbit, the orbit would remain unchanged forever. In reality, due to the slow attraction of the rest of the universe, the Moon is actually RECEDING from the Earth and it will NEVER fall in as you say! In the dinosaur age, the Moon was visibly larger in the sky, not smaller. Small human satellites slowly fall, and must be boosted up to maintain orbital altitude, due to the slowing effect of friction (they bump into millions of air molecules). Your post is remarkable for being incorrect in every single detail, including the spelling of Hawking's name! It's a bad idea to be arrogantly dismissive when all your facts are wrong! 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
			
			
			
			
				 
			
			
			
			
            
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
 
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | 
	
 
	| 
	
	
	
	 | 
	
 
	| Display Modes | 
	
 
	
	
	
	
		
		  Hybrid Mode 
		
	 
	
	 | 
	
	
 
 
	
		
	
		 
		Posting Rules
	 | 
 
	
		
		You may not post new threads 
		You may not post replies 
		You may not post attachments 
		You may not edit your posts 
		 
		
		
		
		
		HTML code is On 
		 
		
	  | 
 
 
	 | 
	
		
	 | 
 
 
     |  
 |