|
|
|
|
| Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
November 28th, 2015, 01:02 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 369
Thanks: 331
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
American OOB Question
I have a question regarding the 82nd Airborne vs the 101st. I am assuming (big leap) that the airborne units in the oob represent the 82nd and other airborne units while the 101st would be the airmobile units. That said, looking at the morale and experience ratings, there is quite a difference. Airborne 10 each vs Airmoble 5 each. Shouldn't these be closer. I am assuming both these units have similar esprit de corps etc?
|
November 28th, 2015, 02:36 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,714
Thanks: 4,161
Thanked 5,951 Times in 2,927 Posts
|
|
Re: American OOB Question
The ones that jump always are higher rated than the ones that ride along
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 28th, 2015, 05:03 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HQ-RS, Kabul, Afghanistan
Posts: 168
Thanks: 67
Thanked 28 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Re: American OOB Question
It's funny about that. When I was in the 7th ID, (light infantry division)back in the 80s, we were told just how much better we were than the 82nd or 101st. FWIW, the only unit that didn't claim to be the best was 2nd ID when it was a permanent garrison division in the ROK.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to whdonnelly For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 28th, 2015, 08:51 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 369
Thanks: 331
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Re: American OOB Question
I didn't want to start a dick measuring contest.  I just figure with the 82nd and 101st having similar histories, I figured training and morale would be similar. |
November 28th, 2015, 09:47 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HQ-RS, Kabul, Afghanistan
Posts: 168
Thanks: 67
Thanked 28 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Re: American OOB Question
I've heard both sides of it from a "better trained" perspective, so I guess that throwing yourself out of a plane wins the morale argument
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to whdonnelly For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 29th, 2015, 03:49 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: American OOB Question
For a change I'll play it smart and NOT get involved (retired Jarhead here) in an US Army training and morale issue.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Suhiir For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 29th, 2015, 04:04 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,714
Thanks: 4,161
Thanked 5,951 Times in 2,927 Posts
|
|
Re: American OOB Question
The USMC para in SPWW2 only get +5 because their morale is already high ( just in case somebody asks.........)
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 29th, 2015, 09:44 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 369
Thanks: 331
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Re: American OOB Question
I know I can change if I am so inclined I was just asking 1st, if the airmobile unit was the 101st, which was implied in the responses and opinions what people thought, which was answered. Just a curiosity question, nothing more.  |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
