|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2001, 04:33 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
						Posts: 11,451
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Poll: Ship design strategy 
 There are a number of basic ship design strategies; some of these can only be done effectively with a quasi-newtonian propulsion mod.
 Nimble & frail:  Ships are faster than anything else around, and lack any shields or armor.  Theory:  You can't lose if the enemy can't hit you.
 
 SwarmShips:  Twice the ships, half the size.  Weak offense/defense due to size, but tens to hundreds of ships at a time.  Theory:  Rapid building, safety in numbers, finer control over fleet composition.
 
 MuscleShips:  All weapons, with token defenses, and moderate speed.  Theory:  You can't lose if the enemy is already dead.
 
 FortressShips:  All systems organized for defense.  Heavy shields/armor, lots of protection against specialty weapons.  Moderate speed, few weapons.  Theory:  If they can't hurt you, you can't lose.
 
 I am deeply devoted to the FortressShip.  I've designed and built $100,000 DNs with that goal in mind.
 My dad goes for the nimble & frail.  Zero KT of defense, but 13+ movement ships that rarely get hit.
 
 Which do you fall under?  Or do you have your own style?
 
				__________________ 
				Things you want: |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2001, 04:50 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: May 2001 
						Posts: 63
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Ship design strategy 
 Swarmships all the way.  Swarmer of choice is the Light Cruiser.  10% defense bonus, and large mounts make them pretty viable in the late game (in sufficient numbers of course     ).  Defense comes mainly from stealth/scattering armor, ECM, and ship/fleet experience, combined with a 20% defense bonus. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2001, 05:22 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Mountain View, CA 
						Posts: 2,162
					 Thanks: 2 
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Ship design strategy 
 "I need guns.  Lots of guns."  Well, perhaps not *extremely* so, but for my BBs/DNs I tend to favor firepower and speed.  But then, I play vs. the AI, which doesn't exactly fare well against extensively-trained ships, so being hit isn't that often an issue.      
------------------
-- The thing that goes bump in the night
				__________________Are we insane yet?  Are we insane yet?   Aiiieeeeee...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2001, 05:29 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA 
						Posts: 3,070
					 Thanks: 13 
		
			
				Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Ship design strategy 
 I guess I'd fit under muscle ships. I've been known to sacrifice an engine or two to fit one more weapon in.
 ------------------
 Cap'n Q
 
 The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the
 human mind to correlate all of its contents.  We live on a placid
 island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was
 not meant that we should go far. -- HP Lovecraft, "The Call of Cthulhu"
 
				__________________Cap'n Q
 
 "Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2001, 05:59 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 5,085
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Ship design strategy 
 Max speed, stealth and scattering when they are available, a PD mount, 3-4 shields, sensors, and the guns for me. Occasionally I'll go nuts and make a ship with like 8 shields, but that's ussually when someone pulls out a Null-Space cannon     
Phoenix-D
				__________________ 
				Phoenix-D
 
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation. 
-Digger |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2001, 06:04 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Private |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2001 
						Posts: 19
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Ship design strategy 
 My preferred design so far is kind of a hybrid - Nimble Fortress ships.  They have has many engines and movement enhancers as possible, a goodly amount of defense, and just a few powerful guns, and maybe a couple of missiles on the larger ships for long range planetary bombardment.  I also like to swarm then into large fleets up to about 30-40 ships if I can with support ships - repair, refueler, mine sweepers, and specialized boarding ships with tractor beams and shield, weapon and engine damagers. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2001, 06:24 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Riverside,Ca,USA 
						Posts: 90
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Ship design strategy 
 I would say there is another type you missed and that is the balanced ship.  
Good offensive/defensive abilities with decent speed.  
This is the type I useally go for. Especially in solo games. 
Having said that, my ships in multiplayer tend to adapt to what my opponents are using and what I have to work with. I have used all the types in one game or another.   
				__________________I apologize. I'm ... sorry. I'm sorry we had to defend ourselves
 against an unwarranted attack. I'm sorry that your crew was stupid
 enough to fire on a station full of a quarter of a million civilians,
 including your own people. And I'm sorry that I waited as long as I
 did before I blew them straight to hell. ... As with everything else,
 it's the thought that counts. -- Captain John Sheridan, Babylon 5
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2001, 06:54 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA 
						Posts: 191
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Ship design strategy 
 I'm with Rich04; I go for very balanced ships.  Just like with weapons, each of those ship types has inherent advantages/disadvantages.  Nimble ships can't be easily hit by Fortresses; Swarms are so small they're worthless against Muscle; and so forth. 
A balanced ship has a chance against all other types, I think.
 
Of course, my true favorite is a swarm of Fortress and Muscle ships.  Who says you can't have a fleet of 70 DN's?     
LL |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2001, 07:52 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: May 2001 
						Posts: 63
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Ship design strategy 
 When I want balance (which is always) I go for balanced fleets rather than balanced ships.  Because weapons have different ranges/reload times it would just seem to work better that way. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2001, 07:58 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2001 
						Posts: 96
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Ship design strategy 
 For me it's Nimble & Frail all the way. In my current game I've built only unarmored, unshielded ships with good engines and as many weapons as possible. 
 ------------------
 "Gentlemen, we have nearly a thousand ships waiting to be thrown into the fight at the proper moment to seize control of the Foundation. I say we should change that. I say, throw those thousand onto the board now--against the Mule."
 -- Randu of Haven, from "Foundation and Empire," by Isaac Asimov
 
				__________________"The bigger the smile, the sharper the knife." - Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #48
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |