|
|
|
|
| Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|
May 26th, 2022, 08:30 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #369 Petrovski jam
Difficulty: easy/medium
Size: medium
Time: medium
Playable from either side: Yes medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 4.0
No tanks
No artillery
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 27th, 2022, 01:36 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #370 Strongpoint Mexiko
Difficulty: Easy
Size: small/medium
Time: short/medium
Playable from either side: Yes medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 4.0
No tanks
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 28th, 2022, 12:10 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #371 The trap at Taesaehjoki
Difficulty: Medium/hard
Size: Medium/large
Time: Medium/long
Playable from either side: Yes Medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 3.5
No tanks
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 28th, 2022, 07:59 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #372 Fire of the Ferdinands
Difficulty: Easy/medium
Size: Medium/large
Time: Medium/long
Playable from either side: Yes Medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 3.5
No artillery
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 30th, 2022, 02:39 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #373 Jagdtigers at Kligenberg
Difficulty: Hard
Size: Medium
Time: Medium
Playable from either side: Yes Easy/Medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 3.5
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 31st, 2022, 12:27 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #374 Balignano spur
Difficulty: medium
Size: Medium
Time: Medium
Playable from either side: Yes Easy/Medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 4
No tanks
|
May 31st, 2022, 09:42 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #375 The clash at Jort
Difficulty: medium
Size: Medium/large
Time: Medium/long
Playable from either side: Yes Medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 4
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
June 5th, 2022, 02:04 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Scenario #376 The fields of Borodino
Difficulty: Medium
Size: Very large
Time: Very long
Playable from either side: Yes Easy/Medium as player 2
Enjoyability: 2.5
Low enjoyability score due to too many turns of movement before combat starts. Even mortars start out of range.
|
June 5th, 2022, 08:55 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,714
Thanks: 4,161
Thanked 5,952 Times in 2,927 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetLT
Low enjoyability score due to too many turns of movement before combat starts. Even mortars start out of range.
|
OTOH does this not allow a variety of movement options for players making it suitable for PBEM for those who like to choose their own route to battle? ( and who have the time and patience to do so? ) |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
June 5th, 2022, 02:25 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario reviews
Not really.
The obvious routes to the objectives are pretty limited and player 2 has more than enough units that being sneaky is not needed. I even stopped moving the units in the north because I got tired of doing so.
Playing as the Germans I went with a simple frontal assault and had no problem achieving an easy victory. It just took a lot of playing time to get there.
I would cut the number of turns down and move the units closer to contact.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
