|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 13th, 2001, 06:08 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Private |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 
						Posts: 1
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Small Afterburnner 
 I was looking at small fighter designs and I see no point in using the small AB. It takes the space of 2 engines while giving the same combat movment as 2 engines and NO movment in normal space. YOu are better off just putting the 2 engines on. The small fighter can handle up to 9 engines which only leaves enough room for 1 of the smallest weapons and a ECM or sensor. If you add the AB, you can't mount any weapons making the unit worthless. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 13th, 2001, 10:31 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: california 
						Posts: 2,961
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Small Afterburnner 
 at higher tech levels, the afterburner 3 generates 3 points of combat movement for 2KT.  an engine only generates 1:1, so this gives you 2:3.  you get one extra movement point and you get to scrap 2 engines.  also looking at maximum tech, you spend 1/2 the minerals if you add an afterburner and scrap the two quantum engines, and you only expend 2 (TWO) units of radioactives.  well worth it, if you ask me.
 ------------------
 "...the green, sticky spawn of the stars"
 (with apologies to H.P.L.)
 
				__________________...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
 (with apologies to H.P.L.)
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 13th, 2001, 04:16 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Biddeford, ME, USA 
						Posts: 1,007
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Small Afterburnner 
 Another minor point:  IIRC Afterburners don't use supplies.  (I am a work and only doing this from memory, so if I'm wrong, please correct me....) |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 13th, 2001, 05:25 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: USA 
						Posts: 111
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Small Afterburnner 
 Actually, fighters with all engines, and no weapons ARE good for something.Build a small amount on a planet. If the planet gets attacked, they get launched, and the attack ships chase after the fighters, ignoring the planet. The fighters run away as they have no weapons, and never get caught because they have lots of movement.
 Doesn't always work, but if you get surprised, and don't have enough time to build a good defense, try it out. I've saved a number of planets this way.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 14th, 2001, 01:26 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ohio 
						Posts: 8,450
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Small Afterburnner 
 I have never used them on small fighters myself, although Puke makes some good points about the resource usage. But they are certainly not useless for the medium or large fighters.
 Geo
 
				__________________I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
 Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 14th, 2001, 06:42 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA 
						Posts: 3,070
					 Thanks: 13 
		
			
				Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Small Afterburnner 
 Another use for such fighters would be decoys to draw PDC fire away from your missiles and armed fighters. Never tried it myself, just thought of it while reading this thread. 
 ------------------
 Cap'n Q
 
 The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the
 human mind to correlate all of its contents.  We live on a placid
 island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was
 not meant that we should go far. -- HP Lovecraft, "The Call of Cthulhu"
 
				__________________Cap'n Q
 
 "Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 14th, 2001, 07:55 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 
						Posts: 1,661
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Small Afterburnner 
  quote:Originally posted by Lupusman:
 Actually, fighters with all engines, and no weapons ARE good for something.
 Build a small amount on a planet. If the planet gets attacked, they get launched, and the attack ships chase after the fighters, ignoring the planet. The fighters run away as they have no weapons, and never get caught because they have lots of movement.
 Doesn't always work, but if you get surprised, and don't have enough time to build a good defense, try it out. I've saved a number of planets this way.
 
 
Brilliant idea! I have to try this. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 14th, 2001, 09:19 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 1999 
						Posts: 8,806
					 Thanks: 54 
		
			
				Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Small Afterburnner 
 Hehe. Clever! Was that on purpose or accident that you discovered that?
 Another use I have for unarmed fighters is minesweeping.
 
 If you can fleet them with ships, they could resupply ships that were out of supplies limping home.
 
 PvK
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 14th, 2001, 07:55 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: USA 
						Posts: 111
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Small Afterburnner 
 Sort of on purpose.An AI player which I was friendly with suddenly decided to attack me. I usually blockade my warp points, but it already had a fleet in one of my loosely defended systems. I had a fleet a few turns away, and I didn't want two or three of my planets to get bLasted.
 I just had to hold them off just a couple of turns, so I tested in the simulator all sorts of things that I could build in one or two turns, including platforms and fighters. Nothing was working, but I noticed that the enemy was going after my fighters first. And Voila!
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 15th, 2001, 09:31 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Utah 
						Posts: 221
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Small Afterburnner 
 Here's how I see the usefulness of Afterburners.  It takes 2 engines to get one combat movement point, a 2:1 ratio.  Afterburners make combat movement points so at the second level of afterburners they become quite useful.  Afterburner 2 makes 2 combat movement points for 20 kt, that would require 4 engines to get the same amount of movement.  So, I make my fighters so they have an odd amount of strategic movement points and an afterburner 2 or 3.
 I can get 8 combat movement points using 7 Quantum engines and an afterburner 3 on a large fighter.  Quite impressive, considering it still is tough to kill and can deal damage.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |