 
			
				November 11th, 2003, 04:10 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				Lieutenant Colonel 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Jan 2002 
					Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada 
					
					
						Posts: 1,498
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Real World Philospohy
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				Originally posted by General Woundwort: 
 In an intuitive sense, this is certainly correct - people of all stripes do make similar distinctions between right and wrong. But these standards are not completely universal - some religions bid you love your neighbors, some bid you to eat them.  And having an intuitive sense of right and wrong still does not answer why it is right or wrong, nor does it give any compelling external reason to insist on what is "good" in the face of desires for the opposite. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 I'm not quite sure if you are agreeing with me or not.  Sure standards of what is right or wrong vary sure, but my point is it IS possible to know what is right or wrong without religion.  And it is not even hard to figure out why these things are wrong.  Would I be pissed if John Doe stole my car?  Yea.  So would it be wrong for me to steal his? Yea.  
The implication that all athiests don't know it is wrong to rape or murder and don't know why is just ridiculous. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 |