Enough whining!

[quantum_mechani]

That some strategies are better than others is a given. But when something is agreed on by veteran players as a must or unusable, then it can limit the potential of the game. While some of this may be due 'jumping on the bandwagon', there are many options that would be very hard to argue as viable options. Some people are implying that balancing means reducing dominion's complexity. IMO, quite the opposite is true, more usable options means more complexity.

Take as an example treelords, few would argue that they are equal to the value of a fire king (let alone an air queen). Would the game be harmed by making them better?