|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 2nd, 2003, 11:17 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Private |  | 
					Join Date: May 2003 Location: Braunschweig, Germany 
						Posts: 32
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter 
 
	I visited some sites, linked on the first flash site. And read a lot (I should have spend my time in my books insteadQuote: 
	
		| Originally posted by chewy027: If my memory serves me, the Eclipse SSD was the cloned Emperor Palpatine's new flagship in the Dark Empire comic book series. I think it was in Dark Empire II to be exact. I also remeber it being bigger then the comparison pic shows.
 |   ) and found that the eclipse is just the right scale there, a bit shorter than a SSD (11-13 km) but more massive, but who cares about this comic ships, I dont like them, they are not real Star Wars in my oppionion. But I am surprised the D`deridex is so large, even as large as an ISD (But I guess with less mass) and generally the ISD is much more smaller in comparison than I guessed...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 3rd, 2003, 09:13 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Colorado 
						Posts: 1,727
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter 
 
	That's what glassing is like, I think.Quote: 
	
		| Posted by dogscoff (Member # 1372) on May 06, 2003, 16:24: 
 http://www.theforce.net/swtc/holocaust.html
 
 Here's the Endor link. I don't think you can argue against this kind of research Andres, but if you want to try I'll be listening with interest.
 |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 3rd, 2003, 11:17 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 1999 
						Posts: 8,806
					 Thanks: 54 
		
			
				Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter 
 Is there a way to get the "It's not destroyed on use." part to actually work? 
PvK
 
 [quote]Originally posted by Andres:
 
	Quote: 
	
		| ... Here's the superlaser:
 Name                  := Superlaser Mk II
 Description           := Massive sized laser strong enough to overcome the strongest planetary shields and destroy worlds.
 Pic Num               := 347
 Tonnage Space Taken   := 20000
 Tonnage Structure     := 20000
 Cost Minerals         := 50000
 Cost Organics         := 100
 Cost Radioactives     := 30000
 Vehicle Type          := Ship\Base
 Supply Amount Used    := 1500
 Restrictions          := One Per Vehicle
 General Group         := Weapons
 Family                := 25008
 Roman Numeral         := 2
 Custom Group          := 0
 Number of Tech Req    := 1
 Tech Area Req 1       := Superlasers
 Tech Level Req 1      := 2
 Number of Abilities   := 1
 Ability 1 Type        := Destroy Planet Size
 Ability 1 Descr       := Can destroy a huge sized planet. It's not destroyed on use.
 Ability 1 Val 1       := 5
 Ability 1 Val 2       := 0
 Weapon Type           := Point-Defense
 Weapon Target         := Ships\Planets
 Weapon Damage At Rng  := 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 0 0 0 0 0
 Weapon Damage Type    := Normal
 Weapon Reload Rate    := 8
 Weapon Display Type   := Beam
 Weapon Display        := 12
 Weapon Modifier       := 0
 Weapon Sound          := EMPIRELASER.WAV
 Weapon Family         := 2440
 |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 3rd, 2003, 11:19 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 5,085
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter 
 Why shouldn't it work? The "destroyed on use" part of stellar manip components is a seperate ability. 
				__________________ 
				Phoenix-D
 
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation. 
-Digger |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 3rd, 2003, 11:55 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 1999 
						Posts: 8,806
					 Thanks: 54 
		
			
				Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter 
 I didn't remember that. Thanks.    |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 4th, 2003, 05:05 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 1999 
						Posts: 8,806
					 Thanks: 54 
		
			
				Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter 
 It's been updated. Now there are several scales. 
I think their new Death Stars are off - at least one of them. I don't think there was that much difference between the two.
 
And, their King Kong is still too small.     
But it's a great site! I'm glad to see they are still adding stuff.
 
PvK
  
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Kamog: Hey, check out this  page which has drawings of Star Trek, Star Wars, and Babylon 5 ships to scale, compared to real ships and buildings.  There's the Empire State Building, Eiffel Tower, Statue of Liberty, etc compared to Godzilla, Battlestar Galactica, Galaxy Class Starship, Omega Class Destroyer, Star Wars Space Slug, etc.
 
 Each drawing is scaled to 1 pixel = 1 meter.
 http://mirror.wolffelaar.nl/zardalu.sytes.net/
 |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 8th, 2003, 02:00 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: May 2002 Location: Canada 
						Posts: 3,227
					 Thanks: 7 
		
			
				Thanked 44 Times in 28 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter 
 so I guess size does matter    |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		
		 Hybrid Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |