.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
The Star and the Crescent- Save $9.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 8th, 2003, 04:03 PM
Ruatha's Avatar

Ruatha Ruatha is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Linghem, Östergötland, Sweden
Posts: 2,255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ruatha is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Gas planets vs rock planets???

Ice isn't sucha waste as you might think.

In PBW games Ice can be a valuable commodity for trade, enabling you to get all three colony techs. Whereas if you start with rock you might trade and get gas colony tech if you're lucky but you'll have to stand in line to trade with the ice colony dudes.

Having said that I prefer rock, nothing beats solid ground underneath your feets.

Good to have one more scandinavian here.

[ May 08, 2003, 15:04: Message edited by: Ruatha ]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 8th, 2003, 04:28 PM
FadingSuns's Avatar

FadingSuns FadingSuns is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 87
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
FadingSuns is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Gas planets vs rock planets???

I have to admit that I like Rock planets with no atmosphere. Almost every moon is prime even with limited cargo space. Once I get Ice tech it usually gives me the rest of the moons as well as larger planets to easily colinize.
__________________
A man never stands so tall as when stooping to help a small computer -Infocom
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 8th, 2003, 04:50 PM
DavidG's Avatar

DavidG DavidG is offline
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
DavidG is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Gas planets vs rock planets???

I pick Rock or Gas. I like Gas because the planets are always medium or larger. Thus less micromanagement. I think Rock are more numerous but lots of small planets (I believe in terms of Facility space things are pretty much equal)

What I like about Rock is that it is easier to find a sector with a rock planet and a rock moon. Very usefull for training ships.
__________________
SE4Modder ver 1.76
or for just the EXESE4Modder EXE Ver 1.76
SE4 Mod List
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 8th, 2003, 05:02 PM

Gryphin Gryphin is offline
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gryphin is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Gas planets vs rock planets???

I like the Gas Giant / Storage.
Things like Robotoid Factory have more of an impact.

I never thought about that, but yes, less micro managment.
Thanks David.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 8th, 2003, 05:06 PM
Grandpa Kim's Avatar

Grandpa Kim Grandpa Kim is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 858
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Grandpa Kim is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Gas planets vs rock planets???

The Iceman cometh!

Yes, I take ice! Contrary to popular opinion, they are as numerous as rock. And having it makes me a valuable commodity. You will pay big time for my ice tech!
__________________
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, teach.
Those who can't teach, slag.

http://se4-gaming.net/
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 8th, 2003, 05:46 PM

Cyrien Cyrien is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 626
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cyrien is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Gas planets vs rock planets???

I also prefer ice. It is slightly less common than rock but when you take that in with the fact that everyone knows that and then takes rock you actually wind up with far less competition and more space to grow. And of course everyone wants what you have and so few others have!

I ussually take none as well and live off of the moons mostly.

One weakness to this strategy is of course in order to get the same level as others you have to produce more colony ships since each small planet has less space.

One advantage however is that you finish building all your facilities on them and if you work like me and on anything with 6 or more facility slots (Oh how I love you Advanced Storage Techniques) you build a space yard... well you get some massive ship output capacity really fast as well.

Really I think they are all just about ballanced in the early game. Late game anything/none may be at a slight disadvantage being unable to terraform gas giants but this is easily countered by simply gaining another races population. Or worse case scenario having to blow up all the Gas Giants and remake them over and over till you get what you want(flash backs to SE3 anyone?)
__________________
Oh hush, or I'm not going to let you alter social structures on a planetary scale with me anymore. -Doggy!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 8th, 2003, 05:55 PM

Aloofi Aloofi is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In the diaspora.
Posts: 578
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Aloofi is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Gas planets vs rock planets???

I always take rock, cause there are greater chances of getting a breathable planet per system, thus allowing for stronger and more defensible Capital System Colonies.
__________________
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------

When somebody says he is going to kill you.........believe him. -Holocaust survivor
.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.