|
|
|
|
 |

June 8th, 2003, 11:07 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Force from gravity is relative, sure:
F = G((M * m)/(d^2))
Where F is the magnitude of the force due to gravity, G is the gravitational constant (it is only sort of constant, as it depends on the units used), M and m are the two masses involved and d is the distance between the two masses. The direction is towards the other object.
Also, as Acceleration = Force/Mass, the acceleration is also relative.
__________________
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
|

June 9th, 2003, 12:43 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Quote:
Originally posted by David E. Gervais:
Well, I'm definately a 'Constant', and that's alot better than being a 'Variable' IHMO.
hmmm,.. but then again my post count is always changing, so I might be a 'variable' disguised as a 'constant'.
Come to think of it, many of the people here would best be described as 'Regulars',..
|
Yeah, a variable can be static, or it can be const, and also a variable can be a member.
|

June 9th, 2003, 05:04 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
In this forum, you can be bailed out at any given time when you stumble into a scientific discussion. Gotta love it! 
|

June 9th, 2003, 06:12 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Quote:
Originally posted by PvK:
I think you need to study anti-logic to quantify Fryon.
PvK
|
Not sure who this Fryon is... but it is quite impossible to quantify a person. 
|

June 9th, 2003, 07:22 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Is the gravitational constant really constant?
|

June 9th, 2003, 07:39 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Quote:
Originally posted by Kamog:
Is the gravitational constant really constant?
|
To the best of my knoweledge, within a given system of units (e.g. metric: meters, seconds, kilograms; "English": feet, seconds, slugs) the gravitational constant is constant. However, we have only had the tools to measure it for a fairly short period of time, and only on Earth.
__________________
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
|

June 9th, 2003, 03:13 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
And around earth, and all over the solar system, and all over the galaxy...
If the gravitational constant was different over at alpha centauri, for example, then the stars would be orbiting each other at the "wrong" speed.
PS: And, variables can also be functions in certain cases.
[ June 09, 2003, 14:15: Message edited by: Suicide Junkie ]
__________________
Things you want:
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|