|
|
|
|
 |
June 23rd, 2003, 04:24 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4, MOO3, and HOMM4
You completley missed my points, you know.
|
June 23rd, 2003, 04:26 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4, MOO3, and HOMM4
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
You completley missed my points, you know.
|
How so?
__________________
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
|
June 23rd, 2003, 04:28 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4, MOO3, and HOMM4
My main point was that Posts are statements of opinon, not factual reports. Do you agree or disagree with this?
[ June 23, 2003, 03:29: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|
June 23rd, 2003, 04:32 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4, MOO3, and HOMM4
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
My main point was that Posts are statements of opinon, not factual reports. Do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Usually so - however, when specifically disagreeing with someone, especially via quoting, you are implying that the other person is objectively wrong when leaving out qualifiers that modify that nature.
Besides, you used the plural when you said I missed your points; that's only one.
Edit: And come to think of it - I did address that one a bit, I just didn't word it so that it was entierly obvious that I was addressing it: I mentioned that BM's case was a different scenerio and I talked about the format of your post.
[ June 23, 2003, 03:49: Message edited by: Jack Simth ]
__________________
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
|
June 23rd, 2003, 04:48 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4, MOO3, and HOMM4
The presence or lack of direct quotes in a post is irrelevant. It is quite common to post implied opinions after a quote.
BM's post is not a different scenario (at least, not different enough in regard to this issue to be a relevant difference).
=0=
By the way, the "=0=" is a section break, as I thought I made very clear. Different sections were not parts of the same argument, and so should not have been bunched together. Please do not do that in the future. They were deliberately separated for a reason.
=0=
About "points"... I was giving out a free s?  Actually, you seem to have (marginally) addressed my other point(s), so... yeah...
=0=
Is there any point in continuing this? We have bloated down this thread enough already...
[ June 23, 2003, 03:49: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|
June 23rd, 2003, 04:54 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4, MOO3, and HOMM4
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
By the way, the "=0=" is a section break, as I thought I made very clear. Different sections were not parts of the same argument, and so should not have been bunched together. Please do not do that in the future. They were deliberately separated for a reason.
|
I just have to say this.  You in no way indicated that the "=0=" were section breaks. You said the following at the beginning of the sentance that came after the first "=0=
.
Quote:
|
And now for a mostly disjoint subject.[...]
|
By no means did you make it "clear" that those were section breaks in the argument. Your simple statement of "And now for a mostly disjoint subject." does not say what the "=0=" were there for. You just indicated that you were moving onto another point.
__________________
Ragnarok - Hevordian Story Thread
-------------------
I think...therefore I am confused.
They were armed. With guns, said Omari.
Canadians. With guns. And a warship. What is this world coming to?
The dreaded derelict dwelling two ton devil bunny!
Every ship can be a minesweeper... Once
|
June 23rd, 2003, 04:59 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4, MOO3, and HOMM4
Implication...
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
