Ship Design for Dummies, weapons, armor, shields, oh my!

Slynky · #1 July 25th, 2003, 07:03 PM

I guess I go at it a bit differently.

I build my ships according to what I see on my enemy ships. In general, if I am in a defensive posture, I build ships with lots of firepower and wait at warp holes. If I'm on offensive mode, I'll use a bit more armor and shielding.

So, in the "Slynky Book of Ship Design", how ships are built depend on several factors and vary from game-to-game.

For example, if I find myself facing Asmala, I just go ahead and put the "coffin components" on board to save time

Fyron · #2 July 25th, 2003, 07:09 PM

Well... when you have played many PBW games, you get an innate feel for what you will need at various times in the game.

My ship designs do vary depending on the enemies and other game situations and such; they just end up being rather similar from game to game.

Geo, I normally research to DUC V and PDC III before getting Chemistry or armor. Destroyers with 5-6 PDCs slaughter all early game fighter/missile rush strategies.

geoschmo · #3 July 25th, 2003, 07:10 PM

Ok, adding a little more indecision to the mix. I ran some new tests. This time with LC's and large mount DUC V's. One fleet of all DUC V's and the other of DUC V's and armor. With armor I it was no contest. The All weapon ships had a clear advantage. If I stepped it up to Armor 3 it was not so clear. On balance the all weapon ships still won more battles, but they were dinged up pretty badly and the armored ships won a few.

So this get's me back to the research question. If I compensate for the higher cost in researching Armor 3 I will have to penalize that empire by giving it a lower tech weapon. But as even as it is now that will clearly push the advantage to the all weapon ships.

The more tests I run on the this the more I get to the conculsion that for fleet combat less armor or even no armor and all weapons is the way to go. What am I missing?

Now, clearly in a one on one fight the armor ship would have an advantage since he could survive the first couple shots. Shots which have a good chance of crippeling the all weapon guy by taking out his bridge or engines. But I think this advantage disappears in the mass of a fleet battle.

Help me understand it.

Geoschmo

[ July 25, 2003, 18:11: Message edited by: geoschmo ]

geoschmo · #4 July 25th, 2003, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Geo, I normally research to DUC V and PDC III before getting Chemistry or armor. Destroyers with 5-6 PDCs slaughter all early game fighter/missile rush strategies.

Ok, well that makes sense. But if that's the case why bother ever researching armor at all? Go to LC's and start researching shields. You need Physics anyway for all the better beam waepons, you can't stick with DUC's forever. And the only other good thing to come from the chemestry branch is resource manipulation. And you can do without that for a long time. Am I wrong? I am just trying to figure out when the armor should come into play.

Geoschmo

oleg · #5 July 25th, 2003, 07:22 PM

It is not easy to instruct ships to gang up on one ship and pound it. You must use "most damaged" as a first firing priority, but I often see such ships moving aimesly (poor pathfinding) and fire ineffectively from a long distance. IMHO, the most effective priority is "nearest" but that may lead to the spreading of fire and armored/shielded ships can Last longer even in fleet battles !

oleg · #6 July 25th, 2003, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by geoschmo:

quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Geo, I normally research to DUC V and PDC III before getting Chemistry or armor. Destroyers with 5-6 PDCs slaughter all early game fighter/missile rush strategies.

Ok, well that makes sense. But if that's the case why bother ever researching armor at all? Go to LC's and start researching shields. You need Physics anyway for all the better beam waepons, you can't stick with DUC's forever. And the only other good thing to come from the chemestry branch is resource manipulation. And you can do without that for a long time. Am I wrong? I am just trying to figure out when the armor should come into play.

Geoschmo

DUC -> PPB. Now the only protection for a long time is armor !

geoschmo · #7 July 25th, 2003, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by oleg:
DUC -> PPB. Now the only protection for a long time is armor !

The only protection against PPB, yes. But if my tests so far are accurate you are better off with no protection at all and just putting on more weapons. That's entirely the question I am trying to figure out.

Geoschmo