|
|
|
|
 |

May 28th, 2004, 05:14 PM
|
|
|
Re: Rated Challenges Thread
Quote:
Originally posted by Alneyan:
While speaking of settings, will the Talisman be allowed or not? Or in other words, should we assume that one of the players in each time will go for the religious Trait?
|
Well, if it wasn't mentioned, then default game settings apply. So, Yes.
Or are you saying you'd rather it was No?
|

May 28th, 2004, 09:22 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,030
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Challenges Thread
Talisman or not doesn't matter to me as long as we all agree that its OK (not only legal  ) to take it.
The openers however changes the whole flow of the game. I'm definitely against it.
__________________
Never trust a cop with rubber gloves.
|

May 29th, 2004, 02:15 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Challenges Thread
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

May 29th, 2004, 02:17 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Challenges Thread
Quote:
Originally posted by Alneyan:
And as it happens, I have an old debt to repay. *Winks at Slynky*
|
Gee, nice to know I have TWO people with a grudge to settle. (and I've been sucking up to both of them soooo nicely... )
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

May 29th, 2004, 09:59 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Challenges Thread
Same as Primitive here, I would merely like to know if the Talisman is welcomed here or not. I gather that if is it on, both teams will go for it, and as quickly as possible. (I haven't made any calculation about how many turns you need, but my wild guess would be somewhere between turn 30 and turn 40)
As for openers, I do believe you could have three such ships running as early as turn 30. (And possibly before) You merely need 350,000 research points to have SM II, and then you have about 10 turns to get SM III for 450,000 research points (not much with three homeworlds). The main problem will obviously be to get the resources needed for the retrofitting part, so you might need one or two more turns. If you are really doing well, it might even be possible to reach SM IV in time (for an additional 800,000 research points), but don't quote me on that.
So I would be strongly against Warp Openers (and Warp Closers, as closing all wormholes would be quite a problem), but I don't have a strong opinion on the Talisman as long as both teams agree either to take it or to forget it. It wouldn't do if only one team had this device for example, while the other decided to invest in Organics Extraction.
Why Slynky, I need to get even for this certain KOTH game, but in the light of our recent games, I will be benevolent towards your people. Well, I will not put them in the same kind of thrall as Parabolize's subjects, if you get my meaning.  (Am I too confident? It could be the aforementioned propaganda that is showing up)
|

May 29th, 2004, 10:53 AM
|
|
|
Re: Rated Challenges Thread
I obviously hadn't been clear enough in my earlier edit. I had actually accepted a veto of Opener tech several Posts ago
So here is my proposed game:
The Grudge-Match of Doom
Mark/Slynky vs Primitive/Alneyan
Medium spiral (with teams together on their own side of the map)
3 Good planets
100000 starting resources
Yes to Intel
No to Ancient Race
No to Warp openers (by agreement, leaving all other stellar manip tech available)
Max ships
Max units
All other settings as default (so Religious is available)
Are we sufficiently agreed? Who can set up the game for us?
Mark
[ May 29, 2004, 09:55: Message edited by: Mark the Merciful ]
|

May 29th, 2004, 02:42 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Challenges Thread
The Grudge-Match of Doom
Mark/Slynky vs Primitive/Alneyan
Add "no ruins"
Also, not that it's a big thing, but I get tired of warpholes always being at the edge...I like the danger of not knowing where they are, so how about "warp points located anywhere"?
And isn't there a setting for "limit Primitive's ship count to 25"? We should turn that one on, too.
As to game setter-uppers, Geo might be reading and put aside his school books for a moment. The Baron has assisted in this before but I know he said his time has become limited. Same for Tesco. Considering it's a game with quite a few high rankings at stake, Asmala might step in and get us started.
Whoever does it, should generate (with ruins turned off) a medium spiral map that "looks good" for a team game and one that leans toward the large size (I've noticed that the size of the maps generated with medium can sometimes be kind of small).
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|