|
|
|
 |

January 9th, 2004, 01:53 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 665
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
Best game?
Definately Mediaval Total War and the Viking expansion pack for it.
Very very close second is Hidden & Dangerous II
Worst game?
I dunno, I dont really buy and play many computer games. Someone told me the Lord of the Rings games are bad, so may be those, but I havn't tried them so dont know
__________________
ook ook ook ook ook oooooook
|

January 9th, 2004, 01:59 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
Definately Mediaval Total War and the Viking expansion pack are definately great. I got pretty frustrated at its lack of automation in larger games. It could be a real chore moving my massive numbers of units around...
Unfortuantely I'm still using the nine gigabyte SCSI hard drive I picked up about five years ago, so I had to can it for space. Time to buy a new hard drive...
|

January 10th, 2004, 02:46 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 15,630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 31 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
quote: Originally posted by Loser:
quote: Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Worst game is tied for that Civ 3 expansion (because it is part of Civ 3) and MOO3.
|
Ouch. At least Civ III ws playable.
[edit: 2 != 3] So? There are a lot of horrid games that are "playable." And besides, part of the problem with Civ 3 is the evil marketing BS they pulled with it, splitting the game into 3 parts so they could milk more money without adding ANY meaningful features in any of the expansions. Civ 3 + 2 expansions at their best almost equal Civ 2 Gold at its worst, save some really stupid things like removing the hit point/firepower system of Civ 2 that helped tremendously over Civ 1. No comparison at all to Civ 2 ToT. Fyron and I are on the same page when it comes to Civ 3. In fact I think it was how we started talking. You should do a search for Civ 3, Civ III or something like that. 
__________________
Creator of the Star Trek Mod - AST Mod - 78 Ship Sets - Conquest Mod - Atrocities Star Wars Mod - Galaxy Reborn Mod - and Subterfuge Mod.
|

January 10th, 2004, 02:49 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 665
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
Loser, I bought Mediaval when I had my old machine (a 500Hz Celeron with about 4GB of hard drive and a really lousy voodoo graphics card). The game was appalling.
Then tried it on my new machine (3GB Hz 120GB hard drive with a Radeon Pro) and oh lordy, it is really someone rather special indeed oh yes oh yes indeedy. Damn I love it.
__________________
ook ook ook ook ook oooooook
|

January 9th, 2004, 03:09 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
You can't really compare a free download to a purchased expansion... expansions are supposed to add new hard-code features, not just changed data sets.
|
I disagree. What if Aaron decided to hide data files inside the .exe file like other dudes do ? Than the SAME change will be regarded as a "new hard-code feature, not just changed data sets".
It is a testimony to the MM greatness and a shame on the major games developers that incrediably radical game play change can be so easily ridiculed by you !
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|

January 9th, 2004, 03:22 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
Best Game of the year:
F1 2003. (F1 racing game for PS2 by Sony)
(maybe that is, if I could play it)
Worst marketing descision of the year:
Sony's descission not to release game in North America and their exclusive deal with the FIA meaning no one else can make an F1 PS2 game either. 
|

January 9th, 2004, 03:40 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
Medieval Total War runs great on my machine, a 2.4 GHz P4 with a mid-grade GeForce4, it just took up a lot of space that I needed for other things. I'm sure I'll put it back on when I get a new, larger SCSI hard drive.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|