.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

The Falklands War: 1982- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 29th, 2004, 02:55 AM
Electrum's Avatar

Electrum Electrum is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 156
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Electrum is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Rated Game Proposal

I have no preference. What ever the Commander & Chief prefers.
__________________
Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time, BUT Laziness Always Pays Off Now.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 29th, 2004, 04:35 AM
Slynky's Avatar

Slynky Slynky is offline
General
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Slynky is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Rated Game Proposal

I think Spoon and Electrum have a good idea. Let's leave it up to the Commanders.

So far we have:

Turn Times: 48 hours till turn 15 (then 72 hours)
Map: Large (to be set up fairly by an approved non-player dividing teams across the map)
Type: To be decided
Racial restrictions: 2,000 points; 1 good starting planet; Low tech cost; No trait will be lowered to show "non-existant"; No Religious
Game restrictions: No mines; No intel; All players on a team must take the same colony type but a DIFFERENT atmosphere; surrender/gifts/trades/(etc.) allowed

Currently in question are atmospheres and tech cost.

As others, I will agree with what my commander prefers.

Yes, I know the setup of this game is taking a while but it is entirely possible, as in a 2 x 2 team game, that one team will finish in places 1 - 4 and the other will finish in places 5- 8...meaning quite a few points for the persons on the top and bottom.

This ISN'T a game where you made a treaty with a person halfway through the game and can dispose of them if they fall way behind...this is a game of what people believe to be the best (available) players in the Ratings system and will (most likely) combine the ability of each as a single player with their ability to contribute to the goal of the whole team.

So, Asmala and RexTorres...what are your thoughts on settings?
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 29th, 2004, 06:47 AM

rextorres rextorres is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 364
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
rextorres is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Rated Game Proposal

I would add no Ancient trait.

I would propose 1 colony type and 1 atmosphere per side. No one can take the "none" atmosphere type.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 29th, 2004, 06:52 AM
Slynky's Avatar

Slynky Slynky is offline
General
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Slynky is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Rated Game Proposal

Quote:
Originally posted by rextorres:
I would add no Ancient trait.

I would propose 1 colony type and 1 atmosphere per side. No one can take the "none" atmosphere type.
Sounds like a fair proposal! As to Ancient, I must have missed it (when I proposed the game) because I think the game would be better without it.

So, Rex, any opinions on tech cost?

(I'm off to bed)

Asmala? Counter comments?
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 29th, 2004, 10:44 PM
Electrum's Avatar

Electrum Electrum is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 156
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Electrum is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Rated Game Proposal

a Question:
We will have no intel & no racial traits to Non-existant. Does that mean we need to keep our intel trait above non-existant too? Seems a waste.

[ April 29, 2004, 21:46: Message edited by: Electrum ]
__________________
Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time, BUT Laziness Always Pays Off Now.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 30th, 2004, 02:50 AM
Slynky's Avatar

Slynky Slynky is offline
General
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Slynky is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Rated Game Proposal

Quote:
Originally posted by Electrum:
a Question:
We will have no intel & no racial traits to Non-existant. Does that mean we need to keep our intel trait above non-existant too? Seems a waste.
Considering no intel, I would think we can allow that ONE trait to be non-existant. Thanks for pointing it out.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old April 30th, 2004, 10:13 PM
Asmala's Avatar

Asmala Asmala is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Asmala is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Rated Game Proposal

Quote:
Originally posted by rextorres:
I would add no Ancient trait.

I would propose 1 colony type and 1 atmosphere per side. No one can take the "none" atmosphere type.
I second these (i.e. I vote option (2)). About tech cost, I don't care whether it's medium or high.
__________________
'The surest sign that there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.' Calvin and Hobbes
Are you tough enough to be the King of the Hill?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2026, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.