Is the price of Dominions II a deterrent?

[PvK]

Hmm. It is too bad not to allow friends to play in the same game from one copy, as long as they aren't taking it home. Especially for getting girlfriends, wives, children, parents, etc. involved. It seems like there might be a reasonable work-around to allow this. At least, to allow them to play multiple nations hot-seat in the same game. That is, allow the same registration number as long as the same network address is used. I guess it would still be a problem for people calling in on dialup accounts with dynamic IP addresses, but maybe other means could establish it was the same computer.

Mmm, another idea - give everyone several "sub" registration codes, but only allow them to be used if their "master" registration code is also in the game. Or, do like many games do, and allow people to play multi-player only, and only if at least one player has a registered copy.

PvK

[ November 03, 2003, 23:47: Message edited by: PvK ]

[blackwulf]

Originally posted by Watchdog:
They use CDkeys too?! Oh my god... I don't patronize bioware or blizzard because of their attack on home lan environments. Guess I'm adding shrapnel to my list of unfriendly money grubbing company's.

Wow that statment says it all.

Blizzard just recently released a mammoth patch/enhancement for a game that is over two years old. Bioware have developed some of the best games in RPG over the Last decade. Both are dedicated to their customer base and produce award winning titles. However you don't patronize them because you feel that they don't deserve to be paid for each person that enjoys countless hours playing their games.

Originally posted by Watchdog:
You people just don't have the right to expect home Users to pay for multiple licenses of software. You just don't, period. Sooner or later that tactic is going to run you guys out of business and I'll be happy to see it happen..

Actually they do have that right. Just like you have the right to spend your money where you want to.

[licker]

Originally posted by PvK:
Hmm. It is too bad not to allow friends to play in the same game from one copy, as long as they aren't taking it home. Especially for getting girlfriends, wives, children, parents, etc. involved. It seems like there might be a reasonable work-around to allow this. At least, to allow them to play multiple nations hot-seat in the same game. That is, allow the same registration number as long as the same network address is used. I guess it would still be a problem for people calling in on dialup accounts with dynamic IP addresses, but maybe other means could establish it was the same computer.

Mmm, another idea - give everyone several "sub" registration codes, but only allow them to be used if their "master" registration code is also in the game. Or, do like many games do, and allow people to play multi-player only, and only if at least one player has a registered copy.

PvK

I've not tried hotseat, but you can play on teh same comp no problem I'm assuming.

Sure its nicer to have the Lan, but hey, many people playing on one CD is supported...

[Watchdog]

I fail to understand what is so difficult to grasp about my position. My complaint is simple. I want this game, but I feel like the company's business practice's are unethical. This forces me to pass the product by even though I'd really like to play it. I won't because I refuse to patronize a company that uses cdkeys and charges so much for a 2nd rate product.

Let me explain. I want to play this game. But not as much as I want to play, say, age of wonders shadow magic. From there the math and logic are simple.

Shadow magic works just fine on my lan without any cdkey nonsense so I can play it with my girlfriend. It cost less than 35 dollars.

More use, more fun, less cost. Shadow magic wins. So even though Dom is cool, they lost me with their business ethics.

I do not feel like they should make a profit based on individual solely. Over the internet, sure. But in one's own home with one's family?

Do you really think that is just? To treat a family like it's some corporation with multiple licenses of say, office for word processing?

See, company's make money, so do universities and governments. These are profit based organizations, (please, don't make me argue that point I've seen plenty of examples of both of the later institutions ledgers) they make money.

They make money using another company's software. Since they are profiting from another's company's software there is justice in the idea that the company should pay for multiple licenses.

My household makes no profit. Simply put, although I enjoy games they are a leisure activity. I don't make any money from them. Therefore, to suggest that using multiple instances to get the maximum enjoyment from my game is worth purchasing multiple licenses, NO!

BTW, hot seat sucks. Most company's have mothballed this feature. Waste of time.

[Graeme Dice]

Originally posted by Watchdog:
More use, more fun, less cost. Shadow magic wins. So even though Dom is cool, they lost me with their business ethics.

Then provide a mechanism whereby it is possible to prevent others (anyone not in your family) from using your copy of Dom2, while at the same time allowing others (anyone in your family) to play the game. Also note that most games that do not force you to play on only one comptuer still have clauses in their licenses that only allow you to play on one computer at a time.

I'm not really seeing why people are complaining about the price anyways, considering that it's right in the middle of normal prices for just-released games. In fact, it's cheaper than the average new release, at $58 CDN, while most sit at $69 CDN or more.

[blackwulf]

Originally posted by Watchdog:
I fail to understand what is so difficult to grasp about my position.

I feel that your position is unrealistic. Additionally the focus of your position has changed. Originally before you discovered that you need to purchase additional copies to play lan games you were simply appalled at the price. Now the major focal point of your reply is that they dare to require that each player own a copy of the game.

It seems that you want them to knock $10-$15 off the game and allow you and all your friends/family to play multiplayer lan games for free. There is nothing wrong with feeling this way. However to wish that someone goes out of business because they don’t agree with your demands is a bit much don’t you think?

Originally posted by Watchdog:
I refuse to patronize a company that uses cdkeys and charges so much for a 2nd rate product.

.

Why would you want to purchase a 2nd rate product at any price?

Originally posted by Watchdog:
These are profit based organizations, (please, don't make me argue that point I've seen plenty of examples of both of the later institutions ledgers) they make money. .

.

So because you have seen the ledgers of a few companies that have made profits you can infer from this that all businesses are making money?

Originally posted by Watchdog:
BTW, hot seat sucks. Most company's have mothballed this feature. Waste of time. .

.

While I do agree that hot seat is not my favorite . I feel that some people might actually be happy with the option. Simply because it is of no use to you does not make it a waste of time to include.

-blackwulf

[ November 04, 2003, 07:34: Message edited by: blackwulf ]

[PvK]

Originally posted by Watchdog:
I fail to understand what is so difficult to grasp about my position. My complaint is simple. I want this game, but I feel like the company's business practice's are unethical. This forces me to pass the product by even though I'd really like to play it. I won't because I refuse to patronize a company that uses cdkeys and charges so much for a 2nd rate product.

Let me explain. I want to play this game. But not as much as I want to play, say, age of wonders shadow magic. From there the math and logic are simple. ...

I understand. If you like Doms II less than AOW, play AOW. Different players like different games. I believe Shrapnel when they say they need to sell it at $45 based on their costs and business model.

More importantly, my tastes are the reverse of yours in this case. To me, AOW2 is a marginal product, which I wouldn't pay more than about $10 for, while to me, Doms I and II are the best (and really, the only) games of their type. To me, they're worth $45, or even $30 for the one and $45 for the second (plus shipping, etc). I'll be playing the heck out of them, so they'll be great deals for me, which no other game can substitute for.

Anyway, I understand where you're coming from. Stick with what you like. Hopefully though, you can appreciate that some of us think the Doms games are unique, excellent, and well worth the price Shrapnel needs to charge for them.

PvK