|
|
|
|
 |

February 11th, 2004, 08:47 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Improving Treelords
Quote:
Originally posted by Argitoth:
I doubt the affinity to nature means anything more than them having a whopping 4 nautre magic. That IS a lot of nature magic in my opinion.
|
Since it takes at least a 4 nature mage to summon them, you don't really gain anything from it. Pangaea and Man(Crones have 3?) both have easy access to 4 nature, 5 with a thistle mace, so you don't gain much by summoning a treelord instead of going for the enchantments directly.
|

February 11th, 2004, 08:53 PM
|
|
|
Re: Improving Treelords
An addition that I don't feel would be overpowered or in any way effect how the balance of the Treelord is given, while at the same time giving them a reason for nature mages to summon them would be:
Give them a base Nature Gem Income of +~5.
Suddenly they are a Nature Mage with their own source of gems to cast their own spells.
Another Idea would be to have the Province that the Treelord is in, protected by a Forest Dome.
|

February 12th, 2004, 10:56 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 346
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Improving Treelords
An alternative could perhaps be to let them have an ability identical to Faery Trod (but which doesn't cost gems)?
__________________
"Freefall, my old nemesis! All I have to do is activate my compressed gas rocket boots and I will cheat you once again! Belt control ON!…On?" [i]Othar Trygvasson[i]
|

February 12th, 2004, 09:18 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Improving Treelords
Quote:
Originally posted by Leif_-:
An alternative could perhaps be to let them have an ability identical to Faery Trod (but which doesn't cost gems)?
|
Actually, I mentioned that in my first post 
|

February 12th, 2004, 09:38 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Improving Treelords
I believe they should be allowed to summon ents which could be stronger and tougher then vinemen but cost 3 gems when being summoned.
Of course that means the devs would have to create a whole new unit... not sure if they're up for that since they have 95% of the money this game will ever earn.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

February 13th, 2004, 05:29 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Forest of Avalon
Posts: 1,162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 50 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Improving Treelords
Quote:
Originally posted by NTJedi:
I believe they should be allowed to summon ents
|
Wouldn't Huorns be more appropriate? 
|

February 13th, 2004, 11:49 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Improving Treelords
Well, I think they'd be pretty good if the effectiveness with which they summoned Vinemen was drastically improved: What if they could summon Vinemen as "summon allies" instead of using gems at all, and they would appear in larger quantities?
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|