|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 7th, 2001, 08:08 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Richmond, VA 
						Posts: 274
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Ramming/Kamakazi tactics 
 This was brought up in another thread, but I have seen little discussion on this tactic.
 Has anyone used this very much?  sTrategies?  Is it worthwhile?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Ken
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 7th, 2001, 08:14 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: San Diego, CA, USA 
						Posts: 731
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Ramming/Kamakazi tactics 
 IMAO, no, not since they changed the ramming rules.
 The warheads are just too expensive to be cost-effective, except in rare circumstances.
 
 Ramming does have some advantages. If your enemy has such huge ECM superiority that you can't hit him with direct-fire weps, and such heavy PD that you can't get him with fighters or seekers, then ramming may be your Last resort.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 7th, 2001, 08:22 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Peterborough, Ontario, Canada 
						Posts: 907
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Ramming/Kamakazi tactics 
 It is quite a viable strategy actually.  When programming my AI's for the few shipsets I have made/are making I make the Colonizers all have the 'ram' strategy.  The first thing a colonizer usually encounters is an escort when it goes thru a wormhole.  The colonizer will ram and usually survive with most comp intact, the escort will usually have most/all weapons destroyed.  Instead of the colonizer running/being destroyed it now lives/destroys alot of the time. 
  Then there is the case of the heavy carrier that has a shipbuilding component and builds fighters with xplosive warheads, basicly uses them as 'missiles'.  Nasty in combat when you get hit with heavily shielded large fighters with kamakazie warheads, really makes point defense earn its pay. 
  I have seen a few other shipsets use the 'ramming colonizer' ploy, at least the Rage did it to me a few games back, surprised the hell out of me, I was ready to board and they just smashed me flat!    
  Even a non-warhead ship does some ramming damage (not sure how much), so you can either be a target or just ram instead, I have even used this target as POINT DEFENSE, just try using a ship with good shields/armor and ram your way thru a cloud of fighers, 'boooommmm', no more fighters!(good when point defense hasn't been researched/added to ships).
 
Just my thoughts........someone else will probally think of something I didn't     
------------------ 
"The Empress took your name away," said Chance. 
Owen smiled coldly.  "It wasn't hers to take.  I'm a Deathstalker until I die.  And we never forget a slight or an enemy."  -Owen Deathstalker.
				__________________We are all...the sum of our scars....(paraphrased) Matt. R. Stover-'Blade of Tyshalle'.
 
 Human existance is all imagination...Reality is no more than a simple agreement among its participants that this is where we shall meet, and these are the rules that we shall abide by.- Kevin McCarthy/David Silva The Family:Special Effects..
 
 Long Live the Legion!!-Comic book fandom...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 7th, 2001, 08:23 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Brigadier General |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ohio, USA 
						Posts: 1,951
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Ramming/Kamakazi tactics 
 I have used ftrs as kk's loaded with warheadsand when in fair to large Groups they have take out a dreadnaught. The only drawback is that once the group hits, their gone. So if you use this tactic you would need a number of kk Groups of ftrs along with supporting ftrs or ships. 25-30 or more ftrs in a group. As for ramming ships I have done this a number of times and once in awhile they do some damage but not very often, but if you have no other option and you know your going to lose your ship, what the hey, take the shot, you never know.
 
 just some ideas   mac
 
				__________________ 
				just some ideas   Mac
 
BEWARE;  crochety old geezers play SE4, in between bathroom runs
Phong's Head Parking |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 7th, 2001, 08:52 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2001 
						Posts: 60
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Ramming/Kamakazi tactics 
 for fighters, isn't it more effient to use those one shot rocket packs? |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 7th, 2001, 10:14 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
						Posts: 11,451
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Ramming/Kamakazi tactics 
 Ramming warheads on fighters do 2 to 3x the damage.  Both only work once in combat.
 Ramming means you have to rebuild, though.
 
				__________________ 
				Things you want: |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 7th, 2001, 10:49 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 5,085
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Ramming/Kamakazi tactics 
 My idea was to make long-range "smart" missiles out of fighters; make a 1 KT size and a component that flies and rams. But it never did even a half of the rated damage- though I *was* only testing it against shields..
 Phoenix-D
 
				__________________ 
				Phoenix-D
 
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation. 
-Digger |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 7th, 2001, 11:06 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Emeryville, CA 
						Posts: 1,412
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Ramming/Kamakazi tactics 
 A while ago ramming was very powerful, it worked on a 1 to 1 damage ratio.  If you have two ships (no shields), one is 800kT, the other 700kT, and the 700kT rams the 800kT, the 700kT was destroyed and the 800kT drops to 100kT...  Now I believe it is only 40% (with the above example, the 800kT would drop to 520kT), and both ships can survive a ramming attempt (not quite sure how that works though). 
Ramming is still a viable strategy at certain points, such as the colonizer example given, or if you have Organic Tech.  A ship loaded with Organic Armor will usually destroy a ship of the same size class, and have enough left over to completely regenerate in a few combat turns.  The ship warheads are, IMO, largely useless.  The kamakazi fighters look interesting, I'll have to try that out   
				__________________GEEK CODE V.3.12:  GCS/E d-- s: a-- C++ US+ P+ L++ E--- W+++ N+ !o? K- w-- !O M++ V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t- 5++ X R !tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G+ e+++ h !r*-- y?
 SE4 CODE:  A-- Se+++* GdY $?/++ Fr! C++* Css Sf Ai Au- M+ MpN S Ss- RV Pw- Fq-- Nd Rp+ G- Mm++ Bb@ Tcp- L+
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 7th, 2001, 11:13 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2001 
						Posts: 60
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Ramming/Kamakazi tactics 
  quote:Originally posted by Will:
 A while ago ramming was very powerful, it worked on a 1 to 1 damage ratio.  If you have two ships (no shields), one is 800kT, the other 700kT, and the 700kT rams the 800kT, the 700kT was destroyed and the 800kT drops to 100kT...  Now I believe it is only 40% (with the above example, the 800kT would drop to 520kT), and both ships can survive a ramming attempt (not quite sure how that works though).
 
 
 
on a guess, the 800kT takes 40% of 700, or 280, and the 700 kT takes 40% of 800, or 320.  
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				May 7th, 2001, 11:24 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 5,085
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Ramming/Kamakazi tactics 
 Don't bother with the fighters, the warheads don't work- at least on shields.
 I modded the Kamakaize Warhead to do 8000 damage (showed up in the box as 8k). What did the fighter do when it rammed? 6.
 
 EDIT: just did the same with normal and emissive armor. Same damage.
 
 Just did ANOTHER test. Reduced damage to 200. Same result- 6 damage. Are warheads not working correctly?
 
 Phoenix-D
 
 [This message has been edited by Phoenix-D (edited 07 May 2001).]
 
				__________________ 
				Phoenix-D
 
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation. 
-Digger |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |