How do we use Scouts?

#1 February 28th, 2004, 03:37 AM

NTJedi,

Do you even know what "Strength not added" means?

It means it's not affected by strength. Or more clearly, it means that it's not affected by strength. Which is the opposite of "Directly affected by strength".

NTJedi · #2 February 28th, 2004, 04:02 AM

That could be my mistake then... and the description can be read either way.

Damage 10 saying the damage is 10 and the strength of the wielder has not yet been added.

Seems much more logical for them to add:
(strength of wielder added) to the one ThunderBow
instead of adding {strength of wielder not added to all of the bows but one.

[ February 28, 2004, 02:19: Message edited by: NTJedi ]

Arryn · #3 February 28th, 2004, 04:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NTJedi:
That could be my mistake then...

Methinks you owe Cherry an apology ...

NTJedi · #4 February 28th, 2004, 04:12 AM

I was mistaken... not impolite.

Arryn · #5 February 28th, 2004, 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NTJedi:
I was mistaken... not impolite.

"You are also wrong Saber Cherry..." was impolite, at least amongst my social circle, and the way I was raised. At the very least it was tactless. But I suppose your understanding of the term "polite" may suffer from the same malady as your understanding of the phrase "Strength not added" ...

NTJedi · #6 February 28th, 2004, 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Arryn:
the same malady as your understanding of the phrase "Strength not added" ...

In my strict upbringing you appologize for doing wrong to someone... not being wrong about misreading something. LOL

It seems odd the developers added (strength of the wielder not added) to every bow... when only one bow has the effect where it does matter.
Would have been 10 times easier and more logical for them to add (strength of wielder added) for the one special bow... and leave the others blank.

By the way your quote listed above was not exactly polite.

[ February 28, 2004, 02:26: Message edited by: NTJedi ]

Arryn · #7 February 28th, 2004, 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NTJedi:
Would have been 10 times easier and more logical for them to add (strength of wielder added) for the one special bow... and leave the others blank.

On this we agree.

EDIT: however, to be fair to IW, for all other weapons, strength is added. Bows just happen to be an exception. A better phrasing would be "Strength does not apply to damage".

[ February 28, 2004, 02:27: Message edited by: Arryn ]