Any news about the next patch?

[ZzZ]

quote:

---

Originally posted by capnq:
It also seems unnecessary, since you can do effectively the same thing with a single Trade Offer.

---

Er ... not necessarily. I always try to divide most researching efforts among my allies and myself. So how should I know about their results before?

Normally it works like this. I research something that I'd like to share ... I send a gift to my ally. If he had the same idea one round before I cannot do this ... I'm just allowed to accept the gift or reject it.

If I view the gift - note down the techs inside - reject it then an propose a trade (including both gifts) I might eventually lose the gift (when the ally breaks his loyalty inbetween) or will receive it one turn later.

And even if it would work. Why make it so complicated. Why not allow two or three Messages for each player per turn?

And not to forget about the limitation for your ONE message ... how should I explain a new tactic to my ally with 14 short lines of text? It's impossible.

ZzZ

[Will]

quote:

---

Originally posted by ZzZ:
And not to forget about the limitation for your ONE message ... how should I explain a new tactic to my ally with 14 short lines of text? It's impossible.

ZzZ

---

Ever consider *NOT* using in game Messages, but something like, oh, I don't know... perhaps e-mail, or maybe even these instant message things...

I don't exactly see the one message limit as an inhibitor though. There are loopholes in it (multiple gifts to AI to make them not as angry at you, for example), and there are some truely valid reasons (such as demanding removal from two systems, stop ship attacks, and stop intel attacks). At the very least, if this is to be changed, a few players need to think about every possible loophole (aka cheat) with multiple Messages, ways to prevent their usage, and write everything to Aaron.

Or, another thing that could be done, have each message contain multiple parts. You can say everything you want in a single message (add a scroll bar to the text area in the news). Give a gift of technology and request one in return. Demand that the weak empire give up an outer system and submit to a Protectorate treaty. Et cetera.

[Tarkin]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Q:
Has anyone (of course especially Richard) news about the next patch?
I must confess that I am a little bit impatient because I want this bug about the fighters/stacking bonuses (see corresponding topic) corrected before I start a new game.

---

I'm in the same position and have been patiently waiting for an update and will continue to do so. I'm happily filling my time with "Combat Mission" until the fighter problem is corrected.

Interesting that the two best games around today have been produced by independents. Also their support is far and away better than the top money making companies in the industry.

[ZzZ]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Will:
Ever consider *NOT* using in game Messages, but something like, oh, I don't know... perhaps e-mail, or maybe even these instant message things...

---

Hehehe, you might call us hardcore-gamers - but this is NOT an option for us. It gives a special kick when you don't know who the other player is ... especially because we all know each other in RL.

Or ... let's say it like this. If Malfador wanted us to use e-mail for ingame communication why did they implement the message option into the game anyway?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Will:
I don't exactly see the one message limit as an inhibitor though. There are loopholes in it (multiple gifts to AI to make them not as angry at you, for example), and there are some truely valid reasons (such as demanding removal from two systems, stop ship attacks, and stop intel attacks). At the very least, if this is to be changed, a few players need to think about every possible loophole (aka cheat) with multiple Messages, ways to prevent their usage, and write everything to Aaron.

Or, another thing that could be done, have each message contain multiple parts. You can say everything you want in a single message (add a scroll bar to the text area in the news). Give a gift of technology and request one in return. Demand that the weak empire give up an outer system and submit to a Protectorate treaty. Et cetera.

---

Oh yes ... I don't want to force Malfador to implement cheat/exploit options into the game (I hate cheating) ... so your Last proposal would be a good option.

Thank you for your comment on this.

ZzZ

[Will]

Hmmm... I never considered a multiplayer game where all the players are anonymous. Sounds interesting

As for the reason the message option is in the game, I always assumed that it was there mainly for the treaties/demands/gifts/etc., and the General Message option was there simply because the mechanism is already there and it's amusing to see an AI with a home atmoshpere of "None" talk about the weather...

As for the patch (forgot the entire original point of the thread ), I haven't heard anything about a beta patch, and I just did a quick check of the FTP patch directory, and there is nothing new. I'd try an e-mail to Richard, since Aaron is likely busy (since there hasn't been a new patch in over 3 weeks, and nothing has been heard).

--edit, in reference to above:

Which one?

[This message has been edited by Will (edited 13 May 2001).]

[Q]

Thank you Will for the information. So we probably will have to wait quite a bit for the correction of the bug.

[geoschmo]

I sent an email to Aaron this week to make sure he had been informed about the 1.35 command line run bug. He replied that there hoped to have a new patch by the end of the month.

I was not aware of the fighter bug, but assuming someone has let him know about it my guess is that's one of the things they are working on too.

I don't see only allowing one message per turn as a bug, but Z is right that it should allow more room in the message. I too prefer not to have any game related contact outside of the in game Messages.

Geoschmo