.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
The Star and the Crescent- Save $9.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 2: The Ascension Wars

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 26th, 2004, 04:13 PM

Cohen Cohen is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Italy
Posts: 839
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cohen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: MP Game - Zap\'s New game with House Rules

Well I believe we can design out pretender when map is choosen, we've to mail only the password.
__________________
- Cohen
- The Paladin of the Lost Causes
- The Prophet of the National Armyes
- The Enemy of the SC and all the overpowered and unbalanced things.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 26th, 2004, 07:09 PM
Stormbinder's Avatar

Stormbinder Stormbinder is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Stormbinder is on a distinguished road
Default Re: MP Game - Zap\'s New game with House Rules

Quote:
Originally posted by Yossar:
quote:
Originally posted by Stormbinder:
There is no way the whole map will be covered by castles with this rule, it's mathematically impossible under any resonable scenario.
Depends how you define "reasonable". Potentially, every province on the map could have a castle on it, but that would probably be virtually impossible without purposely trying to do that. Reasonably I couldn't see it getting much higher than 50%.
That's my point.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 26th, 2004, 07:30 PM
Stormbinder's Avatar

Stormbinder Stormbinder is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Stormbinder is on a distinguished road
Default Re: MP Game - Zap\'s New game with House Rules

Quote:
Originally posted by Cohen:
The fact is that Norfleet is right about castles.
They're the lone way to defend a province.

If there's no castle many spells can burn your temple.
Armies can do that too, since PD isn't worthing it's cost above 10 or 15 ... and 10 or 15 means a very weak army composed of the worst of your troops.
Nobody is talking about prohibiting all castles Cohen. You can (and should) build a strong mutually supporting network of castles, covering up to 1/3 of all your provinces (more in potentially hot spots), together with temples. (and btw who said that you have to build temples in _every_ province?) Than you'll rely on your castles backbone to retaliate against raiders and destroy them. Even loss of single not fully equiped SC is much worse for attacker than loss of 1 turn province income (and possibly temple) for you.

IMHO this would make the gameplay richer and clearly closer to what was intended by devs - instead of covering each and every province by crappy castles, you actually have to choose where to build them , based upon your strategical and tactical situation, your intelligence on the enemy, local resourses and your future plans. With copycated castles in every province all these points are mostly irrelivent.


Last but not least - keep in mind that everybody is in the same boat. So it would be equally easy or hard for everybody to defend/attack their territory.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 26th, 2004, 08:14 PM
Stormbinder's Avatar

Stormbinder Stormbinder is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Stormbinder is on a distinguished road
Default Re: MP Game - Zap\'s New game with House Rules

All right, password was send. I'll design and upload my pretender when it will become clear what map/settings we would be playing.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 26th, 2004, 08:14 PM
Stormbinder's Avatar

Stormbinder Stormbinder is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Stormbinder is on a distinguished road
Default Re: MP Game - Zap\'s New game with House Rules

double post

[ May 26, 2004, 19:21: Message edited by: Stormbinder ]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 27th, 2004, 11:57 PM
Zapmeister's Avatar

Zapmeister Zapmeister is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hobart, Australia
Posts: 772
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Zapmeister is on a distinguished road
Default Re: MP Game - Zap\'s New game with House Rules

Bump.

I'm curious as to why we're not getting many players. Do people not like the house rules, or the idea of registering with a non-playing registrar?
__________________
There are 2 secrets to success in life:
1. Don't tell everything you know.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 28th, 2004, 12:02 AM
Graeme Dice's Avatar

Graeme Dice Graeme Dice is offline
General
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Graeme Dice is on a distinguished road
Default Re: MP Game - Zap\'s New game with House Rules

Quote:
Originally posted by Zapmeister:
I'm curious as to why we're not getting many players. Do people not like the house rules, or the idea of registering with a non-playing registrar?
I personally don't like the limits on castles, especially since the nations I'd like to play are either blood nations or Ermor, and both have a higher than normal need for castles.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.