|
|
|
|
 |

June 15th, 2004, 04:14 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mountain Citadel vs. Dark Citadel
OK, a dumb question: what are "letters?"
|

June 15th, 2004, 04:20 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mountain Citadel vs. Dark Citadel
Quote:
Originally posted by splooger:
OK, a dumb question: what are "letters?"
|
*Dies laughing.*
Here's a hint: there are seven of them in "letters." 
|

June 15th, 2004, 04:32 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mountain Citadel vs. Dark Citadel
Quote:
Originally posted by HotNifeThruButr:
Mountain Citadels are a **** to storm. I'm pretty sure they're the ones the AI is so fond of, with the long, narrow chokepoint and the towers right on top of it.
|
That's the one. Can be pretty fun for Miasma Ctis.
|

June 15th, 2004, 04:38 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 402
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mountain Citadel vs. Dark Citadel
Quote:
Originally posted by HotNifeThruButr:
I'd need to check with someone, since I always pick Fortified City (13 letters, compared to the castle's puny 6)
|
Ya... good old LUCKY thirteen. Thats alway treated me real well! [cough]
Six is closer to 7, which is defined quite literally as being pretty damn good... as far numbers go at least.
Mountain is equally close BTW
|

June 15th, 2004, 06:48 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Italy
Posts: 839
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mountain Citadel vs. Dark Citadel
Yes they're difficult to storm, but with cost 750 and 5 turns to build you can have very few of them compared to other castles type, and won't give you many money and resources as other castles.
__________________
- Cohen
- The Paladin of the Lost Causes
- The Prophet of the National Armyes
- The Enemy of the SC and all the overpowered and unbalanced things.
|

June 15th, 2004, 07:08 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mountain Citadel vs. Dark Citadel
Quote:
Originally posted by Maltrease:
Six is closer to 7, which is defined quite literally as being pretty damn good... as far numbers go at least.
Mountain is equally close BTW
|
In that case, the fort of choice is the "Citadel", with exactly 7 letters. I expect to see you using this more!
|

June 15th, 2004, 07:47 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Modena, Italy
Posts: 412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mountain Citadel vs. Dark Citadel
Mountain Citadel:
double wall & gates (= inner yard, 2 squares wide)
32 firing points from front towers & side towers
dark citadel:
Dark Citadel:
long passage with giant rock teeths (2/3 wide)
0 firing points
good play
Liga
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|